|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-24-2004, 01:07 PM | #16 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
As I said in my previous post, picking in rounds 4-7 is a crap shoot and so I don't think we can condemn Danny Snyder for Rosenfels not working out well. |
|
Advertisements |
06-24-2004, 01:11 PM | #17 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
i'd kinda have to say, if they don't help the team, then yeah, they're a bust... and trading at a loss isn't good either. You're right in that i don't think many people expected too much from him, so he's not a major bust, but he's still not good enough now to really merit a 4th round pick in retrospect. I'd rather take undrafted hassleback for (cheap) added depth, and that's who we have.
|
06-24-2004, 01:23 PM | #18 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
|
a bust in my book is a player taken in the higher rounds (1 and 2) that is a failure. 3rd rounders, they can be busts, but they werent really counted on as heavily for production. All day 2 picks IMO are not busts. 4th roudn QB's arent supposed to be starters in their early years, so Rosenfels was not a bust to me.
|
06-24-2004, 02:06 PM | #19 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
|
Quote:
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
|
06-24-2004, 04:16 PM | #20 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Winston-Salem
Age: 41
Posts: 138
|
THIS ISNT ABOUT BUSTS. My point was not that Jacobs and Betts and Russell are busts, but that we could have used those picks to select need based players. Ladell Betts was predicted to go 4 or 5 round, and we scoop him up. I do agree that we have done some good drafting, with lavar, jansen etc., but all of those guys were drafted when Snyder wasnt exerting as much influence. It seems to me in recent years he has been going after offensive players at the cost of our defensive line.
It is nice to have Betts as a backup, and to have Jacobs as a backup, but wouldnt it be nicer to have a starting pass rushing lineman? |
06-25-2004, 03:21 AM | #21 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Yeah, and that's what jacobs spot was for, but spurrier felt it was a good pick...
the real answer is wait and see how jacobs etc and the d-linemen we could have picked turn out... if jacobs has a freak performance and hauls in 16 tds, then i'd say i rather have him But I do see your point, and it is a good one, our d-line stinks, but barring injuries, i think thats the only real weakness... |
06-25-2004, 08:46 AM | #22 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Would you rather have Mike Doss or Sean Taylor, Bergman? Personally I think our drafts have been good. It sounds like you want to draft everything into defense and leave our offense to flounder alone on an island somewhere. Personally I don't want us to draft any ends. If we get D-Line, let's trade. D Linemen are so hard to scout out of college and can easily become busts. I almost guarantee either Will Smith or Udeeze don't really do much in their pro careers. I don't want someone like that. It's almost sure fire Sean Taylor will do well, and Taylor Jacobs has been called the best WR on the team by Champ Bailey. Champ is a guy that knows a little bit about WR's.
He had a freak injury last year, and what I heard from the first mini-camp Jacobs is really impressing Gibbs. I bet he starts at some point this season, if not he will next! Cliff Russell needs to work on his hands and then he can be a real threat. From what I saw he had good route running and blazing speed. Now all he needs is some velcro on the ball and his hands/chest and we're set. |
06-25-2004, 11:07 AM | #23 | ||
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
You can't draft on need alone.
Are there any pass rushers that have panned out that were available in the same spots as when we took Jacobs and Betts?? Let's take a look Quote:
2003 2nd round results: Quote:
|
||
06-25-2004, 11:43 AM | #24 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
I was about to make the same post Matty...great minds think alike.
|
06-25-2004, 03:31 PM | #25 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 53
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
All that said, even though Coles is going to be the star in our offense, ala Gary Clark, I think Gardner is going to be great. I think he has good hands and his down year last year was due more to our qbs having no time to throw and SS being disenchanted with him. I think Gardner will benefit from the new coaching staff more than any other player. I think he will be a pleasant surprise, he's a first round player and it's about time he showed his first round ability. |
|
06-25-2004, 08:07 PM | #26 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Chad Johnson seems like another Terrell Owens in the making, and Moss seems like another Coles. I don't think you can go wrong with either one, right now I'd take Johnson though.
|
|
|