The Argument for Team Chemistry?

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-14-2006, 11:14 AM

I would have to say they'll be better, just barely competitive. Still, they have an aging Warner and no offensive line with which to protect him OR Edge.

That Guy · 03-14-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PWNED

so are you feeling the cardinals who were the pick last year will step up this year?

i said so a couple posts ago (and browns next year). I DON'T mean gauranteed playoffs or anything like that. but they got a RB now and the defense will get berry back (and the D's problem's were mental, not really lack of talent). OL still suspect.

PWNED · 03-14-2006, 11:19 AM

i think ferguson would be a good start for them. at least give edge a side to run to. it would have been a good move by THEN to have signed hutch.

03-14-2006, 11:14 AM	#31
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: The Argument for Team Chemistry? I would have to say they'll be better, just barely competitive. Still, they have an aging Warner and no offensive line with which to protect him OR Edge. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-14-2006, 11:19 AM	#33
PWNED The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111 Age: 32 Posts: 1,160	Re: The Argument for Team Chemistry? i think ferguson would be a good start for them. at least give edge a side to run to. it would have been a good move by THEN to have signed hutch. __________________ 143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.

The Argument for Team Chemistry?

Locker Room Main Forum