Around the NFL: NFL Offseason

[MTK]

I like the single digits, why not

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by MTK

I like the single digits, why not

DeAngelo Hall is disappointed this didn't happen when he played.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

You just know every diva WR is going to want #1.

I hope it doesn't pass. The current system makes it easier to keep track of players on the field.

[Monkeydad]

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

You just know every diva WR is going to want #1.

I say beat them to the punch. Every wide out wears number 1. Every single one.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

I say beat them to the punch. Every wide out wears number 1. Every single one.

[MTK]

Plenty of DB's will want #1 too. As we know they're just WR's that can't catch.

[Monkeydad]

Bengals are unveiling new uniforms shortly.

Preview:

https://twitter.com/Bengals/status/1...10061053313024

[skinsfaninok]

To reiterate, 44 qbs have gone first, second or third overall in the last 50 NFL drafts, and exactly two--Aikman and Peyton--have won Super Bowls starting for the teams that drafted them. That makes selecting qbs up high exceptionally risky. My parting shot for
@otlonespn
:

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by MTK

Plenty of DB's will want #1 too. As we know they're just WR's that can't catch.

Kickers, WRs, DBs all wear #1. done

[Monkeydad]

First I've heard of this one, he's not a NFL QB so it doesn't get the same coverage...but just as sick.


https://nypost.com/2021/03/12/yasiel...t-allegations/

[AnonEmouse]

I'm not defending anyone here; if they are guilty throw the book at them, sue them, whatever. But I see a slippery slope with these kinds of allegations. I believe in innocent until shown to be guilty (whether by publicly available validated evidence or a court decision). If someone is denied employment due to a (currently) unproven allegation I can't help feeling uncomfortable, especially where there's a question of a financial case being sought instead of a criminal one.

Or maybe it's my lack of in depth knowledge of the US legal system. Over here a criminal charge is sought and then a civil case can be brought without any clash with the criminal case, to seek compensation (though often compensation is awarded as part of the criminal case verdict). Maybe my understanding, but it seems like you can pursue a criminal case or a compensation case but not both? If they are guilty and the claimants can prove so, why no criminal charges? I can see why the accusations of opportunism abound, especially if the claimants seem to be actively trying to avoid a criminal case.

[skinsfaninok]

"The Cowboys are 6-10 and have not been to a conference championship in 25 years and we will still say they are in their SB window, we can't say that about anyone else" - greeny

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

"The Cowboys are 6-10 and have not been to a conference championship in 25 years and we will still say they are in their SB window, we can't say that about anyone else" - greeny

Most overhyped team in sports.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

"The Cowboys are 6-10 and have not been to a conference championship in 25 years and we will still say they are in their SB window, we can't say that about anyone else" - greeny

Yes, the MEDIA says the Cowgurls are championship-caliber EVERY YEAR.


They repeat a lot of things that are blatant lies, especially at ESPN.