Brunell??

Cooley 350Z · 12-07-2005, 04:33 PM

I was really impressed with Brunell shuffling that ball out of bounds once it hit the end zone. It was just miscommunication between Mark & Portis, but as much as I knocked him after last year, that showed the presence of mind a true veteran has to have. In that same situation, as much as I like Ramsey, I shudder to think what his reaction would have been.

Hog1 · 12-07-2005, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooley 350Z

I was really impressed with Brunell shuffling that ball out of bounds once it hit the end zone. It was just miscommunication between Mark & Portis, but as much as I knocked him after last year, that showed the presence of mind a true veteran has to have. In that same situation, as much as I like Ramsey, I shudder to think what his reaction would have been.

Dude is a WARRIOR!

SmootSmack · 12-07-2005, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by offiss

I wasen't around the site sooner, I have been busy hunting, and sleeping about 3 hrs a night, so sorry, I didn't see the game until last night.

You hunt? What kind of animals? Do you use a rifle or do you just talk them to death?

"Listen Mr. Bear, I've always said you're going to die. Been saying it from day one. And I'll keep saying it until you actually die. So what's it gonna be?"

Hog1 · 12-07-2005, 05:07 PM

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]You hunt? What kind of animals? Do you use a rifle or do you just talk them to death?

"Listen Mr. Bear, I've always said you're going to die. Been saying it from day one. And I'll keep saying it until you actually die. So what's it gonna

LOL -"and that Mr Bear is what makes me a BEAR MAN, not a Bear fan"

Schneed10 · 12-07-2005, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by offiss

The key matchup in this game is Samuels against Berry, Samuels probably get's burned most of the game, and gets Brunell blindsided a few times and probably coughs up the ball at least once.

Not only are you negative, but you're also not paying attention to the league. Bertrand Berry is on IR.

http://kffl.com/player/571/nfl

offiss · 12-07-2005, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

You hunt? What kind of animals? Do you use a rifle or do you just talk them to death?

"Listen Mr. Bear, I've always said you're going to die. Been saying it from day one. And I'll keep saying it until you actually die. So what's it gonna be?"

If you can't handle my reply's than I would advise you not to take shots at me, unfortuantly you have a tough time with people who actually know the game, I mean really do you actually think your an individual who can add real insight to the breakdown of a game? Your better off doing exactly what you do take shots at what others are saying, you are quite the moderator.

So hear it is I know you love to fall back on the I know everything argument to make yourself feel more important because you can't really converse with me with actual substance, unfortuantly when you continually take shots as you do, I have to back myself up, and point out what I have said to back it up, you label me as a no it all, I am not a no it all, I just don't back down when I am right just because your crying about it. There are individuals on this site who think for themselves, and those who just put on the burgandy and gold glasses and agree with everything Gibbs say's and does, guess which one you are?

"Hello Mr. Gibbs, this is Tafkas, what should I be thinking this week?"

As far as the bear is concerned, I did have a nice conversation with him, I said Mr. bear do you follow football? He said yes, he's a bear's fan, I then mentioned your name as a football expert, he then proceeded to laugh himself to death, I will send you the rug.

railcon56 · 12-07-2005, 06:03 PM

DAMN lol

Redskins_P · 12-07-2005, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Not only are you negative, but you're also not paying attention to the league. Bertrand Berry is on IR.

http://kffl.com/player/571/nfl

Forget about it Schneed10......we don't have the insight or knowledge that he claims to have.

Its not even worth replying to him. You'll always get the same answer.

SmootSmack · 12-07-2005, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by offiss

If you can't handle my reply's than I would advise you not to take shots at me, unfortuantly you have a tough time with people who actually know the game, I mean really do you actually think your an individual who can add real insight to the breakdown of a game? Your better off doing exactly what you do take shots at what others are saying, you are quite the moderator.

So hear it is I know you love to fall back on the I know everything argument to make yourself feel more important because you can't really converse with me with actual substance, unfortuantly when you continually take shots as you do, I have to back myself up, and point out what I have said to back it up, you label me as a no it all, I am not a no it all, I just don't back down when I am right just because your crying about it. There are individuals on this site who think for themselves, and those who just put on the burgandy and gold glasses and agree with everything Gibbs say's and does, guess which one you are?

"Hello Mr. Gibbs, this is Tafkas, what should I be thinking this week?"

As far as the bear is concerned, I did have a nice conversation with him, I said Mr. bear do you follow football? He said yes, he's a bear's fan, I then mentioned your name as a football expert, he then proceeded to laugh himself to death, I will send you the rug.

You don't take a joke very well it seems. Anyhow, I could get in a pissing match with you but that wouldn't be very "moderator-esque" of me. Plus, what's the point? Have your fun at my expense. Fine by me.

You are right though, that Samuels vs. Berry matchup will be key this weekend. Right up there with this weekend's other key matchups -Marvcus Patton vs. Stump Mitchell, Roy Green vs. AJ Johnson, Neil Lomax vs. Dexter Manley...really though, if Samuels can't stop Bertrand "Street Clothes" Barry this weekend then we've got problems

skinsguy · 12-07-2005, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Not only are you negative, but you're also not paying attention to the league. Bertrand Berry is on IR.

http://kffl.com/player/571/nfl

LOL!!!!!! Good catch Schneed! As I'll say once more, here's your sign!

MTK · 12-07-2005, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Not only are you negative, but you're also not paying attention to the league. Bertrand Berry is on IR.

http://kffl.com/player/571/nfl

Ouch, not good for a 'football man', better stop hunting so much offiss, LOL

That Guy · 12-07-2005, 10:25 PM

brunell wasn't impressive, but he was solid... the real reason is the run game was just so good vs a terrible defense that we didn't need to pass that much.

SUNRA · 12-07-2005, 10:26 PM

Brunell is efficient. Almost three times the amount of TDs to INTs is what we needed from a QB. Taylor Jacobs and Jimmy Farris have to make a difference immediately. Brunell has my respect. He gave me a win over the most hated team in the NFL in their backyard. Now I will nominate him as the greatest Redskins QB of the last ten seasons after he beats Dallas, New York and Philly.

Kevikazi · 12-08-2005, 04:49 AM

I just don't understand Taylor Jacobs. All I've been hearing is how great he looked in training camp, and I think Champ Bailey once said that he was one of the hardest WR to cover.......so, why is he stinking it up NOW knowing very well that this may be his last shot as a Redskin??? I think getting a bonafide 2nd WR to compliment S Moss should be our priority during off-season (along with pass rushing DE).

NFLeurope · 12-08-2005, 07:24 AM

I've said this before...but ill reiterate...i feel like the offensive position that would help us the most is getting a beastly tight end. I think that would do wonders for opening things up for our receivers. If we played with cooley and the beast (and i continue to hold out false hope that this beast will go by the name of Vernon Davis) then i think our receivers would look like allpros...and once we got the LONG TERM QB situation figured out...i dont see any reason why this offense couldnt be among the best in the league.

So its not like i wouldnt want another good 2nd receiver...its just i feel that if we had to add one impact player on offense, a tight end to pair with cooley would do the most to improve our offense for the long haul...and even next year.

Finally, I am willing to give Taylor Jacobs some more time by the way. He was a second round pick (we dont get too many of those...which makes him real rare)...and he hasn't gotten too much playing time due to injuries. Hopefully now that he is playing he will get up to speed...and start showing off the skills that Gregg Williams and the guys who have to go against him in practice every day have been seeing. I think it is just a matter of playing time for him to get his confidence up..before he becomes really good.

12-07-2005, 04:33 PM	#16
Cooley 350Z Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 42 Posts: 209	Re: Brunell?? I was really impressed with Brunell shuffling that ball out of bounds once it hit the end zone. It was just miscommunication between Mark & Portis, but as much as I knocked him after last year, that showed the presence of mind a true veteran has to have. In that same situation, as much as I like Ramsey, I shudder to think what his reaction would have been. __________________ <PeterGriffinVoice> Lotta Honky's In Here... </PeterGriffinVoice>

12-07-2005, 05:07 PM	#19
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: Brunell?? [QUOTE=TAFKAS]You hunt? What kind of animals? Do you use a rifle or do you just talk them to death? "Listen Mr. Bear, I've always said you're going to die. Been saying it from day one. And I'll keep saying it until you actually die. So what's it gonna LOL -"and that Mr Bear is what makes me a BEAR MAN, not a Bear fan" __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

12-07-2005, 06:03 PM	#22
railcon56 Impact Rookie Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 922	Re: Brunell?? DAMN lol __________________ Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!!

12-07-2005, 10:25 PM	#27
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: Brunell?? brunell wasn't impressive, but he was solid... the real reason is the run game was just so good vs a terrible defense that we didn't need to pass that much.

12-07-2005, 10:26 PM	#28
SUNRA The Starter Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 1,680	Re: Brunell?? Brunell is efficient. Almost three times the amount of TDs to INTs is what we needed from a QB. Taylor Jacobs and Jimmy Farris have to make a difference immediately. Brunell has my respect. He gave me a win over the most hated team in the NFL in their backyard. Now I will nominate him as the greatest Redskins QB of the last ten seasons after he beats Dallas, New York and Philly. __________________ Redskins Member since 1970

12-08-2005, 04:49 AM	#29
Kevikazi Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Maryland Age: 55 Posts: 187	Re: Brunell?? I just don't understand Taylor Jacobs. All I've been hearing is how great he looked in training camp, and I think Champ Bailey once said that he was one of the hardest WR to cover.......so, why is he stinking it up NOW knowing very well that this may be his last shot as a Redskin??? I think getting a bonafide 2nd WR to compliment S Moss should be our priority during off-season (along with pass rushing DE).

12-08-2005, 07:24 AM	#30
NFLeurope Camp Scrub Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 85	Re: Brunell?? I've said this before...but ill reiterate...i feel like the offensive position that would help us the most is getting a beastly tight end. I think that would do wonders for opening things up for our receivers. If we played with cooley and the beast (and i continue to hold out false hope that this beast will go by the name of Vernon Davis) then i think our receivers would look like allpros...and once we got the LONG TERM QB situation figured out...i dont see any reason why this offense couldnt be among the best in the league. So its not like i wouldnt want another good 2nd receiver...its just i feel that if we had to add one impact player on offense, a tight end to pair with cooley would do the most to improve our offense for the long haul...and even next year. Finally, I am willing to give Taylor Jacobs some more time by the way. He was a second round pick (we dont get too many of those...which makes him real rare)...and he hasn't gotten too much playing time due to injuries. Hopefully now that he is playing he will get up to speed...and start showing off the skills that Gregg Williams and the guys who have to go against him in practice every day have been seeing. I think it is just a matter of playing time for him to get his confidence up..before he becomes really good.

Brunell??

Locker Room Main Forum