Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Offseason Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2018, 10:26 AM   #436
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,438
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irrefutable View Post
They may have signed an UDFA sleeper guard. He looks decent on paper.

Sean WelshÂ*|Â*Iowa,Â*OGÂ*:Â*2018 NFL Draft Scout Player Profile
Pat Kirwan brought him up as one of his favorite UDFA guards.

Hope he can at least provide strong competition.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-02-2018, 10:27 AM   #437
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Yeah but what’s more plausible, Kouandjio putting it together or an UDFA winning the job?
We should not be in this position.
We did not address our biggest or second biggest need in our starting line up for a second year in a row. Who in our fucking awesome FO thought Kouandijo or a UDFA starting at LG is conducive to winning?
Why do we we cheap out at Oline but have millions for an oft injured 3rd string WR or an old slot CB?

Last edited by Defensewins; 05-02-2018 at 10:43 AM.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 10:31 AM   #438
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,548
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

I don’t think we’re done looking at guards, a decent vet could easily hit the market
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 10:38 AM   #439
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,580
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Man some of you guys love crying over spilled milk. Not every move works out, shit happens
Yeah I get that...but McClain and Stacy McGee really didn't put it together. So really 2 moves at the same position. 1 I can deal with...but 2 fairly large contracts in free agency same year?

Come'on, that's weak.

McClain was terrible...McGee was JAG. that's some serious scrilla for the worst run defense in the league.
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 10:40 AM   #440
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
I don’t think we’re done looking at guards, a decent vet could easily hit the market
Agreed. Some already are available.

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 10:48 AM   #441
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
I don’t think we’re done looking at guards, a decent vet could easily hit the market
Could?
That is great planning by our FO. Could.
I see how this works, we could win the Super Bowl.
I am sorry Matty, I do not mean to come off as an asshole to you. I am just tired of our FO putting us in this situation for two years in a row. We fail twice to properly address this huge hole in our starting line up.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 11:40 AM   #442
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,580
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

One thing that should be said is we cant expect to get everything we need in the draft...simply rarely happens. Also, we didn't reach and got guys we believe in..

When looking at totals, its pretty shocking to me...not a lot of actual Guards drafted:

2018 NFL Draft Results by Position - Offensive Guards - ESPN

5 in the first 2 rounds...none in the 3rd/4th...5 taken in the late rounds. Simply not enough talent.

And in the first two rounds, Austin Corbett was a god aweful, terrible reach from the Browns. Conner Williams has never played Guard and is projected there...meaning he is a project and not a strong prospect.
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 11:58 AM   #443
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,548
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Yeah I get that...but McClain and Stacy McGee really didn't put it together. So really 2 moves at the same position. 1 I can deal with...but 2 fairly large contracts in free agency same year?



Come'on, that's weak.



McClain was terrible...McGee was JAG. that's some serious scrilla for the worst run defense in the league.

Enter Payne and Settle...

They obviously saw the problem and addressed it, hopefully the results are much better
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 12:00 PM   #444
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,548
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
Could?

That is great planning by our FO. Could.

I see how this works, we could win the Super Bowl.

I am sorry Matty, I do not mean to come off as an asshole to you. I am just tired of our FO putting us in this situation for two years in a row. We fail twice to properly address this huge hole in our starting line up.

Should, feel better?

They obviously felt that bigger holes needed to be addressed in the draft

Doesn’t mean the process of filling out the roster is over
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 12:52 PM   #445
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
Could?
That is great planning by our FO. Could.
I see how this works, we could win the Super Bowl.
I am sorry Matty, I do not mean to come off as an asshole to you. I am just tired of our FO putting us in this situation for two years in a row. We fail twice to properly address this huge hole in our starting line up.
You don't necessarily use the draft to address a need. By that, I'm saying, you don't reach for a guy and draft him higher, even though he would fill an area of need, you'd draft the best player available at the spot or the best player on your draft board at that time. Sometimes, the position you have a need for has a player, who's the best pick at that spot, and you draft him. Sometimes, it doesn't happen that way.

For example, there is a position you really need filled - let's say it's CB. You're picking 54th. There is a CB that is available and he's rated to go, no worse than 54th. Let's say there's an ILB, who's rated to go 34th, but for some reason or another, he fell in the draft and is available. Well, let's say you don't have a need at ILB, and your draft board says you draft that corner at 54th. This would be the case in which you draft for need. You're not reaching for the guy, he was rated to be drafted at, or earlier, than your pick and is available.

But on the flipside, say that CB was rated to go 72nd in the draft, you're picking 54th. You're not reaching for that corner, even though that would fill and area of need. You're either trading down the draft and picking up more picks and possibly trading down far enough to still draft the CB, or you're drafting best player available, which could be that ILB that was rated to go 34th. Do you understand how it works?

It appears that the front office ignores some areas of need, but you also have to understand that you can't go out and fill every single area of need in one or two drafts. Even then, sometimes free agency fills that need, or sometimes you find diamonds in the rough free agents out of college that go undrafted. Remember, this is where Bobby Beathard buttered his bread (wanted that to be a tongue twister lol!) It wasn't that he was going out and filling those teams with first round and second round picks. He was, often, filling those championship squads with diamonds in the rough guys; guys traded from other teams, undrafted guys, guys from the USFL, etc...
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 01:31 PM   #446
SCRedskinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
SCRedskinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pawleys Island SC
Posts: 680
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalskins View Post
You don't necessarily use the draft to address a need. By that, I'm saying, you don't reach for a guy and draft him higher, even though he would fill an area of need, you'd draft the best player available at the spot or the best player on your draft board at that time. Sometimes, the position you have a need for has a player, who's the best pick at that spot, and you draft him. Sometimes, it doesn't happen that way.

For example, there is a position you really need filled - let's say it's CB. You're picking 54th. There is a CB that is available and he's rated to go, no worse than 54th. Let's say there's an ILB, who's rated to go 34th, but for some reason or another, he fell in the draft and is available. Well, let's say you don't have a need at ILB, and your draft board says you draft that corner at 54th. This would be the case in which you draft for need. You're not reaching for the guy, he was rated to be drafted at, or earlier, than your pick and is available.

But on the flipside, say that CB was rated to go 72nd in the draft, you're picking 54th. You're not reaching for that corner, even though that would fill and area of need. You're either trading down the draft and picking up more picks and possibly trading down far enough to still draft the CB, or you're drafting best player available, which could be that ILB that was rated to go 34th. Do you understand how it works?

It appears that the front office ignores some areas of need, but you also have to understand that you can't go out and fill every single area of need in one or two drafts. Even then, sometimes free agency fills that need, or sometimes you find diamonds in the rough free agents out of college that go undrafted. Remember, this is where Bobby Beathard buttered his bread (wanted that to be a tongue twister lol!) It wasn't that he was going out and filling those teams with first round and second round picks. He was, often, filling those championship squads with diamonds in the rough guys; guys traded from other teams, undrafted guys, guys from the USFL, etc...

Check out Joe Jacoby as maybe the best Redskins example of a successful UDFA.
SCRedskinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 01:56 PM   #447
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCRedskinsFan View Post
Check out Joe Jacoby as maybe the best Redskins example of a successful UDFA.
Absolutely excellent example!
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 02:09 PM   #448
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
We should not be in this position.

We did not address our biggest or second biggest need in our starting line up for a second year in a row. Who in our fucking awesome FO thought Kouandijo or a UDFA starting at LG is conducive to winning?

Why do we we cheap out at Oline but have millions for an oft injured 3rd string WR or an old slot CB?


I understand your frustration, but i think you’re overreacting a bit.

- looking over our roster, left guard is the only position where we do not have a clear starter and backup. That’s far better than where we have been in a long long time

- if theres any position to have questions about, Id say offensive guard is one of, if not the “best” one. Offensive guard is the most easily replaceable position in the NFL. We have 2 other offensive lineman who are arguably top 3 in their position and a 3rd (moses) who is near pro-bowl level. Even without the left guard situation resolved, i think most of the other teams in the league would swap o-lines with us in a heartbeat.

- the start of the season is 4 months away. Almost every year, we pick up a surprise cut late in the offseason who becomes a key contributor to this team. Really good guards are going to get cut by other teams in Salary-cap moves.

- even jf we don’t find an adequate guard among the guys on the roster, and even if we don’t sign a veteran later in the offseason, Shawn Lauvao is out there. He’s be more than serviceable as our “last resort” option.

In the end, Its simply too early to panic about the guard spot. If we’re in the same spot in mid July, then I’ll get concerned.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 03:09 PM   #449
Irrefutable
The Starter
 
Irrefutable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

The Redskins UDFAs signed ;
#2 RB
#3 OL
#6 TE
#4 DB

Top undrafted free agents following the 2018 NFL Draft - NFL.com
Irrefutable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 03:19 PM   #450
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

The way some of you talk you'd think we were going out there with a HS roster, remember we were the number 1 rush defense before Allen and Ionnadis got hurt. No matter what we do it seems like half of you will complain to the point of non sense.

I wonder everyone is in agreement it seems that the Cowboys have the best OL in football, without looking it up how many of you could tell me who the LG is??
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.46983 seconds with 12 queries