Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum
Reload this Page Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
Page 2 of 8 1 2 34 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-27-2011, 02:42 AM   #16
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
Another anti-Haynesworth, it seems. lol
Well let's hope the team knows how to use him correctly.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-27-2011, 02:48 AM   #17
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Well let's hope the team knows how to use him correctly.
IMO, trying to use AH's body as a NT wasn't that stupid a choice. What made him fail at NT was his own self-perception. Cofield seems a few steps above AH in the "willingness to listen" department.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 02:59 AM   #18
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOUL-SKINS View Post
Well plus he does that cool " taser" celebration. That's worth it in itself I think.
I love it when the big guys dance! But seriously, why aren't we drafting guys like Cofield (4th rd), Yanda (3rd rd), etc.?
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 03:38 AM   #19
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE
Special Teams
 
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 218
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield



WELCOME TO DC MR. COFIELD!!!!!! WE'RE GONNA PUT SOME BETTER LOOKING COLORS ON YOU SON.......
REDSKINZ-RIDEORDIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 03:44 AM   #20
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Pretty good deal if the rumors are true, 6 years at $36 million. Hopefully he's like the last Giants DT we got, if not better.
What will Aubrayo Franklin's contract look like?
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 05:01 AM   #21
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,949
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Good signing ,sorry to lose him but the Giants are going younger and cheaper.Dumped a bunch of O linemen yesterday.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 06:25 AM   #22
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
If the FO thinks he will fit I'm with it.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 08:09 AM   #23
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
IMO, trying to use AH's body as a NT wasn't that stupid a choice. What made him fail at NT was his own self-perception. Cofield seems a few steps above AH in the "willingness to listen" department.
It wasn't necessarily a good idea. I just want to make sure the team is going to use Cofield to the best of his ability. You can have the best attitude in the world but if a player is being misused or put in the wrong scheme it won't matter (i.e. Carter playing as a 3-4 LB)

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 08:15 AM   #24
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Great signing!
And robbing the Gints makes it better!
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 08:55 AM   #25
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,420
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
We need help along the line, so good signing. Big question is where does he play, NT or DE?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 08:56 AM   #26
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Cofield will play on the interior
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 08:57 AM   #27
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
We need help along the line, so good signing. Big question is where does he play, NT or DE?
I think DE and get Cullen Jenkins to play NT and having Carriker play as the other DE.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 09:01 AM   #28
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Good move.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 09:08 AM   #29
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Good signing, but who's going to play NT?
Whoever plays the best!
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 09:21 AM   #30
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Report: Redskins Agree to Terms with Barry Cofield
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
I would hope he's better than Anthony Bryant for 6 years at 36 mil lol. But tbh, I think you're talking about Cornie Griffin. And if he was that good I'd def. be happy, I remember how good Griffin was in 2004, he definitely should've been a Pro Bowler that year. Also since I was diggin around for Cofield info and tidbits, anybody remember this?



Sounds like he has 36 million reasons not to trash our fanbase now.
He'll be reminded.

Redskins land Cofield | John Keim | NFL | Washington Examiner
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 8 1 2 34 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28094 seconds with 13 queries