|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-07-2011, 10:22 PM | #61 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,446
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Thank goodness you're not the Redskins.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
Advertisements |
01-08-2011, 12:18 PM | #62 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Quote:
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
|
01-09-2011, 12:37 PM | #63 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Herndon,Virginia
Posts: 83
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
what kind of logic is that?
|
01-09-2011, 04:27 PM | #64 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
On another site someone mentioned that Mike and Mike had talked about a team drafting Luck anyway and being able to hold the rights to him even though he doesn't come out this year. It was bantered about that there might not be a NFL rule on doing that but others felt that either
A- the team who drafted him would lose his right next draft and he would be placed right back in for next yrs draft. or B- Teams can't draft a player who has not declared because the NFL does not follow the NBA rules and basically the team would be throwing away a draft pick. So my question to you all is: Could Luck wait till after the draft then declare himself for the supplimental draft? and if he can would it change anything in regards to what teams can go after him? I'm thinking he probably doesn't want to play for the Panthers knowing he owner is cheap or something and maybe worked out a deal with Harbaugh that he would declare after the draft. Why? Maybe it would be too much for the 49ers to give up to trade with the Panthers to go after him but in the supplimental draft the 49ers could offer whatever which would hurt them till the following draft anyway. In other words the 49ers could offer a 1st round pick. Could this be a possibility? or would the Panthers still get first dibbs on him since they did so bad? |
01-14-2011, 11:43 AM | #65 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Herndon,Virginia
Posts: 83
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Luck already said that staying in school had nothing to do with being drafted by the panthers.
|
07-07-2011, 06:56 PM | #66 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Would you make your own Luck? - SportsNation - ESPN
Looks like I'm in the greater half of skins fans that want us to 'lose for luck'
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
07-07-2011, 07:19 PM | #67 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Ridiculous.
|
07-07-2011, 07:36 PM | #68 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Quote:
|
|
07-07-2011, 09:53 PM | #69 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
I really hope we don't have to hear this junk all season. NFL teams don't tank seasons. It's just absurd.
|
07-07-2011, 10:03 PM | #70 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
|
07-07-2011, 10:26 PM | #71 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
I absolutely agree. But if we're going to miss the playoffs (which I'd say is a strong possibility), I'd rather it be with a 2-14 or 3-13 record and the #1 overall pick to land Luck than 6-10 or 7-9 and end up in the 12-15 range. I'm not saying I want us to mail it in, nor do I think we or any other team would. But no playoffs is no playoffs. I'd prefer the #1 pick to be our consolation prize.
__________________
Tardy |
07-07-2011, 10:46 PM | #72 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
07-08-2011, 04:54 AM | #73 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
Players will not tank because they want either a roster spot, a payday, or both.
Coaches won't tank because their jobs are on the freaking line. Only GMs can deliberately weaken their team to the point of suckage, and even then, tanking is INCREDIBLY DIFFICULT because the players and coaches will always want to win.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
07-08-2011, 09:23 AM | #74 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
IF we're going to talk about the presumed 2012 draft, let's not talk about tanking, let's talk about what Danny & Bruce have up their sleeve to land one of the QBs. It's way too early to talk about that, but come draft time next year I'm sure they will be on the phones looking into everything. I have confidence in Bruce Allen that he could pull off a crazy deal to move up if anybody can.
|
07-08-2011, 09:38 AM | #75 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford
The "Suck to get Luck" strategy is for moonbats and fruitcakes.
Probably the same people that think Sept. 11 was an inside job.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|