|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season | |||
Offensive Line | 11 | 11.34% | |
Defensive End | 24 | 24.74% | |
Punter | 45 | 46.39% | |
Linebacker | 17 | 17.53% | |
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-04-2009, 02:00 PM | #31 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
I'm not sure how strong the interest truly is from the Skins' side
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
Advertisements |
03-04-2009, 02:02 PM | #32 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Quote:
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
03-04-2009, 02:02 PM | #33 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
I'm pretty sure someone would've probably already posted this but it's funny nonetheless
"Vinny's e-mail was hacked" http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/78...ailCerrato.jpg
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
03-04-2009, 02:17 PM | #34 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Of these choices, it has to be LB.
Funny how so many people picked punter when we don't have one now. Wasn't Plack cut? I guess Randel El can start punting instead of being on the other end of the kicks.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
03-04-2009, 02:23 PM | #35 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,384
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Ya know, that's probably the most discouraging thing I have heard said about the FO. I am a big supporter of them in general, but if they went out and used a draft pick, and it was a bust, the next way to get one is to find one who is a known commodity. C'est la vie.
|
03-04-2009, 02:24 PM | #36 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 336
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
|
03-04-2009, 02:27 PM | #37 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
03-04-2009, 02:28 PM | #38 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Quote:
I would say punter, but we I don't think we currently have one on the roster, so it's pretty mandatory that we pick one up. Given our current state at the LB position (I mean right now, today), we won't function properly on D without adding OLB help. Like CRedskins said, no Evans or Taylor leaves us in a bind at DE. Daniels will probably be back, but who knows how effective he can be given age/injuries. Chris Wilson is a small, situtaitonal pass rusher, and Rob Jackson didn't even see the field last year. If Carter and/or Daniels missed even 1 game with injury, we'd be in trouble. So I guess O-line it is.
__________________
Tardy |
|
03-04-2009, 02:31 PM | #39 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
03-04-2009, 02:34 PM | #40 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Hopefully we find a way to address all four positions. I'll be really annoyed if we don't draft an O-lineman.
__________________
Tardy |
03-04-2009, 03:42 PM | #41 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Is that a prediction or a suggestion?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
03-04-2009, 03:54 PM | #42 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
03-04-2009, 04:04 PM | #43 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
03-04-2009, 04:05 PM | #44 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
|
03-04-2009, 04:07 PM | #45 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: What Position Would You NOT Address This Off-Season
I sort of see this as a trick question because all the positions we could have *not* addressed (like DT) we already have addressed.
The position I would put the least amount of resources into is DE. But we still need bodies that we don't have right now. I don't think we can stand pat at OT, but I don't necessarily think Jansen can't start for us either. I think it's much more critical that we get a Rabach replacement, although the FA Center market is drying up very quickly.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|