Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


We must draft OL early!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2008, 10:40 AM   #16
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: We must draft OL early!

OL is a spot where you can pick up quality talent in the later rounds. I think we have other more pressing needs.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-24-2008, 11:20 AM   #17
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
OL is a spot where you can pick up quality talent in the later rounds. I think we have other more pressing needs.
I agree for the most part, but if B. Albert is available at #21 I think it's a tough decision. O linemean are available in later rounds, but there's also a smaller bust factor in picking them. Of course there's the mandarich & gallery examples, but I can't think of many more.

I always think of 2000 as a great example of draft decision making; we took Samuels w/the #3 pick & passed on Peter Warrick, who the bengals got a couple picks later I think. We got a durable, franchise all pro LT & warrick is a career journeyman.

I'm not saying that it's that simple for the front office, but I think if an o line prospect looks really good, the probability seems high that the pick pays off in the end. Albert looks as close to a sure thing as there is.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 11:29 AM   #18
riggins44
Special Teams
 
riggins44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 148
Re: We must draft OL early!

Looking back at the original Hogs, May was a first round pick and Grimm was 3rd round.
Jacoby was a free agent. Bostic was cut by Eagles and we signed him to be long snapper. I'm not 100% positive on how we acquired Strake.

I feel we can find good OL in later round or via UDFA.
riggins44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 11:38 AM   #19
Beer is Food
Camp Scrub
 
Beer is Food's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
Re: We must draft OL early!

The more I hear about Albert- the more I like the guy. I hope the skins take him in the first. And, the more I think about it the interior of the OL, G and C, needs help more than any other area on the team. Then DT, DE, S, CB. I'd be very happy if the first 4 picks were on the DL and OL. Although the 1st rounder needs to be BAP. May turn out to be a corner. Still I'd be annoyed if the skins pass on Albert. Monster guard- safe pick. And, Samuals-Albert on the left side would be pretty impossing for the next few years.
__________________
I came, I saw, and I forgot to get my parking validated before I left...
Beer is Food is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 01:10 PM   #20
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by riggins44 View Post
Looking back at the original Hogs, May was a first round pick and Grimm was 3rd round.
Jacoby was a free agent. Bostic was cut by Eagles and we signed him to be long snapper. I'm not 100% positive on how we acquired Strake.

I feel we can find good OL in later round or via UDFA.
That was twenty years ago. Unless your recounting their aquitisions for your own pleasure, citing the template of a system we used in a land far away isn't going to aid this discussion.

I like the pick because its not sexy. The more unsexy picks the Skins have in this draft the more we're building the core of our team. The Skins need a couple of these picks in this draft.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 01:45 PM   #21
EveryHomeGameSince87
Camp Scrub
 
EveryHomeGameSince87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Didn't we try to move a tackle into a guard spot already, and it didn't work out? I think Heyer should be groomed to replace either Jansen or Samuels.
If you are speaking of Todd Wade that guy is horrible anyway! I agree with the grooming for Jansen (cause he will be gone or retired a few years before Samuel) but if we get injury's w/ Kendall or Thomas, Heyer has that footwork to play gaurd! I think that kid is going to be a big piece of our O-Line in years to come
EveryHomeGameSince87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:18 PM   #22
SkinsFanSince91
Special Teams
 
SkinsFanSince91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 368
Re: We must draft OL early!

I don't think that this forum is even necessary. We have waaaay to many holes to fill to be drafting an O-lineman in the first round,

Plus, the poll here says that the O-Line is the LAST place where we need immediate help.

If we did just that, we'd be behind the 8-ball again at the positions we need the most.

Meanwhile, we'd be hoping that marginal, lower graded, and non-first round talent would provide larger returns than expected because we chose to address depth instead of need.

I'm sure most people would say that B. Albert would come right in and start, but we all know that he isn't going to unseat a veteran like Kendal or Thomas just because he was taken first. He would be a top-tier reserve and that's it. We would still have no pass rushing DE, no CB in case Rogers doesn't come through and Springs leave next year, and we would still have to choose from what is available after there is a sure fire run at the tall, rangy, possession-type WRs at the end of the first round.

We have one of the best O-line coaches in the business in Joe Bugel, and if he can turn Stephon Heyer, and undrafted free agent, into the player that he is now, then we can surely expect for him to do that with a lower round pick on our O-Line.
__________________
http://zstiojar.edu.pl/68560
SkinsFanSince91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:25 PM   #23
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91 View Post
I dont think that this forum is even necessary. We have waaaay to many holes to fill to be drafting an O-lineman in the first round,

Plus, the poll here says that the O-Line is the LAST place where we need immediate help.

If we did just that, we'd be behind the 8-ball again at the positions we need the most.

Allthewhile, we'd be hoping that marginal, lower graded, and non-first round talent would provide larger returns than expected because we chose to address depth instead of need.

Im sure most people would say that B. Albert would come right in and start, but we all know that he isnt going to unseat a veteran like Kendal or Thomas just because he was taken first. He would be a top-tier reserve and thats it. We would still have no pass rushing DE, no CB in case Rogers doesnt come thru and Springs leave next year, and we would still have to choose from what is available after there is a sure fire run at the tall, rangy, posession-type WRs at the end of the frist round.

We have one fo the best O-line coaches in the Biz, and if he can turn Stephon Heyer, and undrafted free agent, into the player that he is now, then we can surely expect for him to do that with a lower round pick on our O-Line.
IMO Albert could come in and unseat Kendall very easily. Kendall was solid but he isn't going to hold up for 16 games with his knees and age. Let me ask you this. In 05 and 07 we made the playoffs and why did we lose those games? Or what was a big reason we lost? Cause we could not move the chains and get a 1/2 a yard on 4th down and an inability to protect the passer. Both years we had injuries to the o-line and had no depth. I'm not sure what the stats are for short yardage but I'd be willing to bet that we were at the bottom at converting 3rd and 4th down with a yard or less. IMO we simply can not ignore the line anymore. Especially with the age of Thomas and Kendall.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:35 PM   #24
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
OL is a spot where you can pick up quality talent in the later rounds. I think we have other more pressing needs.
Couldn't you say that about any position? IMO we need to take the best player available at 21 as long as he doesn't play QB, RB or TE.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:36 PM   #25
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
IMO Albert could come in and unseat Kendall very easily. Kendall was solid but he isn't going to hold up for 16 games with his knees and age. Let me ask you this. In 05 and 07 we made the playoffs and why did we lose those games? Or what was a big reason we lost? Cause we could not move the chains and get a 1/2 a yard on 4th down and an inability to protect the passer. Both years we had injuries to the o-line and had no depth. I'm not sure what the stats are for short yardage but I'd be willing to bet that we were at the bottom at converting 3rd and 4th down with a yard or less. IMO we simply can not ignore the line anymore. Especially with the age of Thomas and Kendall.
Good summary.

Albert, if he is still available, would be the best use of our first round pick. We will definately have to address D-Line this year at some point, but the second round looks like a place where a DLman who has a first round grade could fall to us...and then all of a sudden we have two "first round" picks and a great draft.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 02:53 PM   #26
DGreene28
Special Teams
 
DGreene28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinzaholic73 View Post
Thanks man! Yes I have read on a few sites that C.Campbell is now most likely a 2nd rd. pick.
Scouts are saying he may drop out of the first day all together. He looked slow and overweight at the combine. Put up DB #'s in the bench press... and now showed up at the Miami Pro day even more overweight and sluggish. If this guy won't work to get in shape now what makes you think he'll do it after he gets paid. I want no part of Campbell in this draft.
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher
DGreene28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 03:01 PM   #27
DGreene28
Special Teams
 
DGreene28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91 View Post
I don't think that this forum is even necessary. We have waaaay to many holes to fill to be drafting an O-lineman in the first round,

Plus, the poll here says that the O-Line is the LAST place where we need immediate help.

If we did just that, we'd be behind the 8-ball again at the positions we need the most.

Meanwhile, we'd be hoping that marginal, lower graded, and non-first round talent would provide larger returns than expected because we chose to address depth instead of need.

I'm sure most people would say that B. Albert would come right in and start, but we all know that he isn't going to unseat a veteran like Kendal or Thomas just because he was taken first. He would be a top-tier reserve and that's it. We would still have no pass rushing DE, no CB in case Rogers doesn't come through and Springs leave next year, and we would still have to choose from what is available after there is a sure fire run at the tall, rangy, possession-type WRs at the end of the first round.

We have one of the best O-line coaches in the business in Joe Bugel, and if he can turn Stephon Heyer, and undrafted free agent, into the player that he is now, then we can surely expect for him to do that with a lower round pick on our O-Line.
Heyer impressed last year and he may turn out to be an above average OL for the skins but he is not in the same class as Albert. Many times our offense was handcuffed because of his liabilities as a pass protector. I have no doubt Albert would take over a starting role on the skins OL next season... He's that good
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher
DGreene28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 03:08 PM   #28
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We must draft OL early!

It'd be hard to pass up on Albert if he's there. But I do wonder if part of all this talk of getting a WR in the first round, and hardly any talk of an OL is a reflection of the team's lack of faith in Stan Hixon's ability to fully develop a WR from the scrap heap. True, we all talk about Anthony Mix but by and large we don't (and doesn't seem the FO does much either) associate Hixon with being a good teacher who can develop some raw talent; like we do with Bugel and the OL or even now Zorn and QBs.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 05:53 PM   #29
SkinsFanSince91
Special Teams
 
SkinsFanSince91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 368
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
IMO Albert could come in and unseat Kendall very easily. Kendall was solid but he isn't going to hold up for 16 games with his knees and age. Let me ask you this. In 05 and 07 we made the playoffs and why did we lose those games? Or what was a big reason we lost? Cause we could not move the chains and get a 1/2 a yard on 4th down and an inability to protect the passer. Both years we had injuries to the o-line and had no depth. I'm not sure what the stats are for short yardage but I'd be willing to bet that we were at the bottom at converting 3rd and 4th down with a yard or less. IMO we simply can not ignore the line anymore. Especially with the age of Thomas and Kendall.
The reason we lost teh '05 playoff wasnt due to poor o-lineplay. As I recall we finished the season as oneof thebest rushing teams in the league. Portis had a few 100 yd games in a row. The REAL reason we lost the game was the predictability of the playcalling. It was out of date and J Gibbs subsequently hired Al Saunders to spice up the offense.

As for 07-08, we suffered injuries ACROSS the board at CB. LB. OL, and Collins threw 2 interceptions that were returned for scores. It would be foolish to blame both loses on the Oline. In the playoffs, if you can not run and pass well you will lose.

Its great thatt u have a man-crush on B Albert and all, cuz I am the mayor of Jordy-ville, but why would u automatically assume a rookie can unseat a veteran like that. No jobs are given away in the league and especially with the Redskins ofensive line. I mean I dont even expect J Nelson to start if we get him. Eventually he CAN, but he will not receive a 1st round de facto starting position. I will say that he has thepotential to beat him in camp, but im not gonna assume he will start.

We need top tier talen at CB and DE. Period.

We can find WR and OLineman later on. If we were to take them in the first, I wouldn't be happy, but I wouldn't be protest either. Any pick can help. My philosophy is to address need int he first round, unless you have a top 15 pick/or somoen great falls to you like Randy Moss did when he came around.
__________________
http://zstiojar.edu.pl/68560
SkinsFanSince91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 06:07 PM   #30
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: We must draft OL early!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91 View Post
The reason we lost teh '05 playoff wasnt due to poor o-lineplay. As I recall we finished the season as oneof thebest rushing teams in the league. Portis had a few 100 yd games in a row. The REAL reason we lost the game was the predictability of the playcalling. It was out of date and J Gibbs subsequently hired Al Saunders to spice up the offense.

As for 07-08, we suffered injuries ACROSS the board at CB. LB. OL, and Collins threw 2 interceptions that were returned for scores. It would be foolish to blame both loses on the Oline. In the playoffs, if you can not run and pass well you will lose.

Its great thatt u have a man-crush on B Albert and all, cuz I am the mayor of Jordy-ville, but why would u automatically assume a rookie can unseat a veteran like that. No jobs are given away in the league and especially with the Redskins ofensive line. I mean I dont even expect J Nelson to start if we get him. Eventually he CAN, but he will not receive a 1st round de facto starting position. I will say that he has thepotential to beat him in camp, but im not gonna assume he will start.

We need top tier talen at CB and DE. Period.

We can find WR and OLineman later on. If we were to take them in the first, I wouldn't be happy, but I wouldn't be protest either. Any pick can help. My philosophy is to address need int he first round, unless you have a top 15 pick/or somoen great falls to you like Randy Moss did when he came around.
I beg to differ. In 05 R. Thomas was out & our running game suffered. This past year, the right side of the line couldn't stop Seattle's 1 on 1 pass rush. Kerney abused Heyer as expected. Can't blame the kid, he was just a rook. We were lucky that Kerney's hit on Collins was called an incomplete pass, it looked clear that it was a fumble. The reason we had some success is we went to the no huddle & kept them off guard.

I agree, DE & CB are big needs, but our O line hasn't had any real depth for a no. of years. Albert seems a better prospect than most of the guys that are likely to be there for us at #21. If we were talking about picking in the top 10 I wouldn't argue that he's worth taking, cause then we'd be able to land one of the top DEs. i.e. Albert might be the "best player available" when we pick.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.49767 seconds with 12 queries