Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Trouble in Redskins Park?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2017, 10:26 AM   #421
bigant
Special Teams
 
bigant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: garfield new jersey
Posts: 158
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

lets see what bruce does ,my feeling is he,ll screww it up ,just like he did before get ready for a freaking train wreck again
bigant is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-09-2017, 10:27 AM   #422
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,426
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Making it work here was SM's best shot at re-establishing himself. From all appearances that didn't happen. I would prefer he had gotten another 2 years, but let's be honest, his strength was supposed to be defensive magic, and he didn't work it here.

As to the FO set up it sounds to me, that minus the spin, the personnel selection system was a 3 person system, coach-gm-cap/president. It also sounds like Allen's vote counted more on contract issues. I don't think that's a bad system.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:28 AM   #423
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,426
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
If Doctson was a big reach id understand the criticism. But killing a rookie because of unforeseen injury makes zero fucking sense.

Most folks had Doctson as the top WR in the draft and with Desean and Garcon old and in the last year of their deal....it was 110% a solid pick period.
plus we got a 4th round pick this year, just for moving down one.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:29 AM   #424
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,798
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
If Doctson was a big reach id understand the criticism. But killing a rookie because of unforeseen injury makes zero fucking sense.

Most folks had Doctson as the top WR in the draft and with Desean and Garcon old and in the last year of their deal....it was 110% a solid pick period.
Yet our defense had zero help given to them. Yeah it was a great pic.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:32 AM   #425
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,798
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
His drinking lead to his firings before...this time it was absolutely not the reason. BUT as an organization they put someone on the radio to speculate it was.

Your right, we don't need him. We are better off...
How do you know he is not drinking? Honestly how would you know that?

The Redskins can't say he has a drinking problem publicly their are HIPPA rules against that.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:32 AM   #426
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,503
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Making it work here was SM's best shot at re-establishing himself. From all appearances that didn't happen. I would prefer he had gotten another 2 years, but let's be honest, his strength was supposed to be defensive magic, and he didn't work it here.

As to the FO set up it sounds to me, that minus the spin, the personnel selection system was a 3 person system, coach-gm-cap/president. It also sounds like Allen's vote counted more on contract issues. I don't think that's a bad system.
McC was just given 2 years that was clearly not enough time. AND we ALL agreed here this was a long term process.


My biggest problem with Bruce: 1. McNabb trade and then dumb contract 2. RG3 trade 3. Over ruling McC last year giving Cousins the extension.

these are pivotal management mistakes. I mean, set a franchise BACK mistakes. We all do understand this right?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:33 AM   #427
Evilgrin
The Starter
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

We are going to have non-football guys picking players again. Who picked KC, who hates Shanahan. It's just about ego, and not being wrong. I didn't like Shanahan, he was right about Cousins(I was wrong about Cousins). Grow the eff up.
__________________
Bruce Allen “We’re winning off the field,”

Redskins #2 In Revenue Per Year!
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:34 AM   #428
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,426
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
Yet our defense had zero help given to them. Yeah it was a great pic.
Honestly, I think somebody - I don't know who - put way too much faith in Junior Gallette. Remember both years he looked to be an integral part of our line around draft time, only to crash and burn before training camp. Our defense both years would have been far different if he played and played at his expected level.

That reliance on him, by whoever called it, was a large part of our DLine woes.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:34 AM   #429
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,503
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
How do you know he is not drinking? Honestly how would you know that?

The Redskins can't say he has a drinking problem publicly their are HIPPA rules against that.
WP article by a guy who is completely in the know with the Redskins Org and cross referenced with Michael Robinson this morning with the NFL network.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:36 AM   #430
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I think you guys are looking at it wrong.

Bruce hired McC because he knew he didn't have the chops when it came to player evaluation.

But notice Doug Williams and Jay Gruden sat in all of the interviews at the combine.

I feel like some folks are getting it twisted and assuming that Bruce will run the draft board and the draft room. I don't, I think it will be Gruden. Now, nobody has said that yet. But that's how I read it.

So either you don't buy that and you hate Bruce, or you don't have faith in Jay?

I don't want Bruce running the draft board, but I don't think he will be. I'm good with Jay doing it. This isn't a calamity.
The more I look at it, the more that I see that this is becoming Jay's team. It sounds like moving forward he will have more of a saying in player acquisition. BA will continue to have a say in terms of money and cap, which is fine with me.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:37 AM   #431
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,516
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
WP article by a guy who is completely in the know with the Redskins Org and cross referenced with Michael Robinson this morning with the NFL network.


They said he never stopped drinking, but it wasn't a problem. That could be debatable based on who's being asked.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:39 AM   #432
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilgrin View Post
We are going to have non-football guys picking players again. Who picked KC, who hates Shanahan. It's just about ego, and not being wrong. I didn't like Shanahan, he was right about Cousins(I was wrong about Cousins). Grow the eff up.
So Jay Gruden is a non-football guy? Doug Williams is a non-football guy too?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:42 AM   #433
Evilgrin
The Starter
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
So Jay Gruden is a non-football guy? Doug Williams is a non-football guy too?
Williams was a coach, Gruden is a Coach. They aren't decision makers on who gets what contract. Which is why are in this mess with Cousins.
__________________
Bruce Allen “We’re winning off the field,”

Redskins #2 In Revenue Per Year!
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:42 AM   #434
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,503
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
They said he never stopped drinking, but it wasn't a problem. That could be debatable based on who's being asked.
So the same when they hired him? This wasn't, "oh Scotts drinking again".


This to me is like "Desean Jackson is in a street gang or has street gang ties" leaked by the Philly Org as an excuse to dump him.

You can rationalize it anyway you want.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 10:42 AM   #435
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,426
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
McC was just given 2 years that was clearly not enough time. AND we ALL agreed here this was a long term process.


My biggest problem with Bruce: 1. McNabb trade and then dumb contract 2. RG3 trade 3. Over ruling McC last year giving Cousins the extension.

these are pivotal management mistakes. I mean, set a franchise BACK mistakes. We all do understand this right?
I agree on #1, disagree on #2 except when looking in hindsight, and disagree wholly with #3. Having KC playout the year on a prove it deal was a bit of a risk, but honestly looking at how this year's negotiation has gone, and KC's apparent intransigence at being paid as an elite qb when he isn't, I don't know that a deal would have been reached last year, at least not one that was good for the team and good for KC.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.44123 seconds with 12 queries