Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


NFL 2013 First Pick

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2012, 07:18 PM   #1
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
NFL 2013 First Pick

With the season ready to start people are bringing out their Super Bowl and playoff predictions. My question is, who finishes last? I think there are more teams this year in the running then in years past.
My choice is the Jets. Tough division, in fighting, no receivers and the only running option is the backup QB.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:22 PM   #2
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,417
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

1. Arizona, 2.Minnesota, 3. Cleveland, 4. Tampa Bay
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:24 PM   #3
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
1. Arizona, 2.Minnesota, 3. Cleveland, 4. Tampa Bay
Agree, but I'll replace Tampa with Miami.


Edit: I'm actually going to replace Minnesota as well with St. Louis...that teams just awful.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:23 PM   #4
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by rypper11 View Post
With the season ready to start people are bringing out their Super Bowl and playoff predictions. My question is, who finishes last? I think there are more teams this year in the running then in years past.
My choice is the Jets. Tough division, in fighting, no receivers and the only running option is the backup QB.
dolphins dead last. we should trade our 2013 original picks in rounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 to the dolphins for their 2013 original picks in those rounds.
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 09:23 AM   #5
lockeroomman
Registered User
 
lockeroomman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 95
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
dolphins dead last. we should trade our 2013 original picks in rounds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 to the dolphins for their 2013 original picks in those rounds.
dolphins alwasy doing bad
lockeroomman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:25 PM   #6
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,113
Rams 3-13
Miami 3-13
Cleveland 4-12
Ariz 4-12
TB 5-11
Minnesota 5-11
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:32 PM   #7
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Rams 3-13
Miami 3-13
Cleveland 4-12
Ariz 4-12
TB 5-11
Minnesota 5-11
i would trade any of our original 2013 picks straight-up for any of their original 2013 picks (of the same round)
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:48 PM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

St. Louis has just nothing going for them right now (besides those picks we traded them). They're in their own class of bad.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 09:43 AM   #9
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
St. Louis has just nothing going for them right now (besides those picks we traded them). They're in their own class of bad.
They're not exactly lighting it up with those draft picks either. I mean Michael Brockers? I know we're not suppose to judge players based on schools but between being an LSU alum and a 1st round DT I don't think he's going to make it. Janoris Jenkins on the other hand could end up being a hell of a steal but right now he's also quite the risk.

Still the pick of Brian Quick was puzzling to say the least considering the fact that the Rams have had possibly the worst receiving corps since they drafted Bradford.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:52 PM   #10
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Cleveland or Arizona. My guess is Arizona.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:02 PM   #11
IrMitchell
Impact Rookie
 
IrMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Miami/Rams/Browns are my three worst teams.
__________________
One of Canada's two Redskins fans.
IrMitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:06 PM   #12
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Rams or Cards.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:06 PM   #13
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
St. Louis has just nothing going for them right now (besides those picks we traded them). They're in their own class of bad.
They literally have nothing
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:09 PM   #14
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

It wont be us or anyone in our division....so count me in as not giving a frilly phantom flying fox.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:17 PM   #15
IrMitchell
Impact Rookie
 
IrMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
Re: NFL 2013 First Pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
It wont be us or anyone in our division....so count me in as not giving a frilly phantom flying fox.
You don't care about anything outside of the NFC East?
__________________
One of Canada's two Redskins fans.
IrMitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.46829 seconds with 10 queries