|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-08-2011, 08:04 AM | #1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
“Then, it got to the point where he said, ‘I don’t want to play first- and second-down nickel. I just want to play third-down nickel.’ Oh my God, you’re relegating yourself to 10-15 snaps a game. Then after that he didn’t want to do the blitzes, he just wanted to rush.” NFL.com news: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
06-08-2011, 09:51 AM | #2 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
I still don't get why the team insists on keeping this guy. Just get rid of him.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
06-08-2011, 10:34 AM | #3 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
I posted this before, but I think it's worth the repost. DT was a disappointment last year - NFL - ESPN DT calls Shanahan 'little man' - NFL - ESPN 'Non-football illness' will keep DT out - NFL - ESPN Look at the case with Daryl Gardner to find out exactly what's going to happen to big boy. Instead of it being a circus, he's just going to suspend fat boy and keep him at home. (paid if he has to) |
|
06-08-2011, 10:49 AM | #4 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
Mike Shanahan's #1 biggest mistake so far is trading for McNabb. Second biggest mistake? Keeping this circus alive. Nothing positive will come from keeping this mistake on the team. Sh*t, trade him for a 7th rounder or some back up o-lineman. I don't care about this guy and the only news I want to hear is that he has been traded or cut.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
06-08-2011, 11:41 AM | #5 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
I think if he's a distraction early on, you suspend him again for 4 games and sit him at home the rest of the year like the Bucs did with Keyshaun. THEN, you wait until the off-season and dump him. |
|
06-08-2011, 11:46 AM | #6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
For Mike Shanahan to win, he needs to get rid of players that aren't up to par, bring new players that get with his plan, and win. Keeping Haynesworth as a distraction is not part of it. All that would tell me is that MS takes things personally and he lets his ego dictate his actions. And Haynesworth will be a distraction, Kevin Sheehan alone will make sure that it is.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
06-08-2011, 01:31 PM | #7 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
__________________
RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!! |
|
06-15-2011, 04:55 PM | #8 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
I am not positive about this but I think that option is not available. When the Eagles sent T.O. home for the year, the NFLPA filed some sort of grievance and the NFLPA won. I believe that the most a team can do is to suspend a player for 4 games for "being a distraction" or things like that. After that, I believe the player has to be put back on the team or released.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
06-08-2011, 10:51 AM | #9 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
This everything to do with $$$$. He's doing whatever he can to get released (not traded) so he can go after another big payday elsewhere.
Could Haynesworth be headed to the Eagles? "Although Haynesworth's contract is worth $100 million, he's already received $35.6 million of that from the Redskins, and his base salaries the next two years are relatively modest -- $5.4 million in 2011 and $6.7 million in 2012. He's due $28.5 million in 2013, including a $20 million bonus, so whoever takes on his contract -- if anybody does -- is virtually certain to release him after the 2012 season." AH knows he'll never see that 28.5 from the Skins, he's trying to cash another 8-figure check before he's done. He has no desire to play football (in any scheme), he only cares about getting paid. As much as I'd love to bury the POS on the bench, make his life hell, and ruin his career, if he doesn't want to play and only cares about money we still need to pay the guy if he's on the roster. If he goes out and takes a nap in the middle of plays, there isn't much we can do. At this point it's probably best to cut our losses get as much as we can for him in a trade and move on.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
06-08-2011, 11:46 AM | #10 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
I'm almost willing to guarantee that nobody will even pay him those types of figures after this point. Not after his act here in DC. I think the next contract he gets is going to be heavily incentive laden.
|
06-08-2011, 12:25 PM | #11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
He'll likely get out of here and get either a fat contract from a coach/team that had a positive experience with him and chalk up his poor attitude/performance to the regime change/3-4 in DC. Or, as you mentioned, get a 1 yr. incentive deal, play well and get another fat payday next off-season.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
06-08-2011, 03:00 PM | #12 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Easier said than done. Snyder is not going to let this joke of a person walk away and sign with another team after paying him almost 40 mil for a handful of games played. As much as I wish he'd go away I kind of side with the Redskins on this.
|
06-08-2011, 04:39 PM | #13 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swedesboro NJ
Posts: 98
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2011, 04:52 PM | #14 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
Quote:
He doesn't have to do anything else, he's going to get suspended by the league when it resumes. Beating up a motorist, and now the sexual assault allegations (compounded with his prior past) is going to lead to a suspension. I'd bet good money on it. |
|
06-08-2011, 10:20 AM | #15 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins D-coordinator talks frustration over Haynesworth
I'm usually the one of the fans who claim we need to get what ever we can from him, but since this years FA went to hell in a hand basket and we couldn't pick up a draft pick for him I'm kinda in the mood of just cutting him.
My only other option is to keep making him suffer if we are not paying him a ton of money and let him rot on the bench. Heck he doesn't want to play more then 10-15 plays a game lets just minimize it more and make him water boy. Maybe he can hand out the Gatorade to all the players who actually want to play when then come off the field. Then (my optimism is kicking in) if the team makes the SB or wins it the team can deactivate him so he won't get a ring. |
|
|