![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
JUST LIVIN
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,916
|
Would you rather have the skins win and Brunell stays or skins lose and Ramsey starts
I'm torn right now,on the one hand being a diehard skins fan I want us to win Sunday,on the other hand if we lose and that means Ramsey gets the next start then I'd be happy with that,I cant see Brunell pulling an Astros and regaining the fountain of youth,in 6 games he's passed for under 100 yds 3 times,Ramsey has never passed for less than 100 yds in games he wasnt hurt,Brunell can't even scramble anymore,Ramsey is just as mobile as that slow sob,to me the best case scenario would be for Brunell to hurt his hamstring again and we win with Ramsey in the lineup,I dont see this game being close unless the defense scores twice for us and we actually make a play on special teams.When was the last time we actually blocked a punt or a fg? Wheres Brian Mitchell when you need him? Hell I would rather have him at qb then Brunell
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
I want the Redskins to win. For one thing we can't afford to many more losses, and for another it's not as if Ramsey equals automatic wins once he starts.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
JUST LIVIN
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,916
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 44
Posts: 461
|
if we become totally out of contension, i would like to see ramsey play the last few games even if its horrid and completely nasty and we have 7 TO's a game. he needs to learn gibbs system and gibbs needs to utilize ramsey's strengths. i think the problem is gibbs is optomistic to change a whole gameplan for ramsey, cuz ramsey cant rollout like brunell, and half our passing plays are that f'ing rollout. and ramsey needs to get a feel for max protection or atleast more than he was used to (spurrier) and get comfortable in a actual pocket
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Quote:
__________________
#21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
IMO we should go with Ramsey, as much as I hate to say it, but he can't do any worse than Brunell. Give the kid another shot and see if he can do better than his last try. At least PR can throw the ball downfield.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 56
Posts: 1,587
|
I think that even Gibbs will have to reconsider the QB position if Brunnel throws for less than 100 yards again against the Packers. Hell, I'd be happy now if the offense would just sit on the ball and not let the opposing defense score. The problem is that if that is what I would be happy with, our offense must be really sad.
I'm hoping that Gibb's wants to build a game around Portis, then, when the defenses can't key on the QB, bring in Ramsey.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 44
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Quote:
Really, I dont think anyone should root for us to lose so Ramsey will get in. Who even knows if he will. I'm rooting for whoever is in there, although I would rather see Ramsey, I'm not gonna root for the SKins' to lose.
__________________
#21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
i want a win, rather than see ramsey start. wins are the most important thing.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
You didn't have a choice for "Ramsey starts and wins'? Why not?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
People seem to be focused on nothing but Ramsey's performance against the Giants this year.
Does anyone remember that before he got the snot knocked out of him by Week 6 last year, he was: -Leading the league in passing yards -Had us off to a 3-1 start (which could have easily been 4-0) -Had a QB rating of about 95 -Brought us back in games where we seemed lost (i.e. down 18-0 at half against the Giants) If Ramsey had been well protected last year he would have been one of the league's best QBs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 61
Posts: 1,001
|
I want whoever will help the Redskins win consistently. Brunell had ample opportunity and failed miserably. Joe can't let this continue. He should give Ramsey a chance to show what he can do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,766
|
I'm not going to hope the Skins lose just so Ramsey will play.
We can't afford to lose many more. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Hoping the Skins lose is sort of blasphemous. It always cracks me up when people say that they hope the Skins lose for Machiavellian reasons. That's not a real Skins fan.
That being said, I hope that the Skins lose and Ramsey starts. Just kidding. I hope the Skins kick the shit out of GB and then when we're lining up in the victory formation, Brunell kneels down and his hip pops out and ends his career. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|