|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
10-04-2004, 11:38 AM | #1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Its Gotta Be..
Guys, i think i have it figured out. i hate to say it, but its the WRs. our guys aren't quick enough, they aren't getting open. we always knew Ramsey held the ball too long, we thought it was just his thing, but is that a trait associated with Brunell?
its just true guys. everytime we DO complete a pass, the DB is draped all over our guys. whens the last time we hit a receiver in stride? whats the biggest separation we ever got this season or end of last? Gardner was never a speed guy, and is supposed to be getting it in the middle and dropping some because of it. but Coles is hurt and he's playing like it. he's been dropping passes cuz he's battling it out with DBs, when before he'd be out in the free and clear. its all chain reaction from there. our guys are easy to cover. so they stack against the run, teams blitz, the Oline cant hold forever, and we get 1-3. i love Coles but he just isn't even close to 100%. at this point his toughness and willingness to play hurt is hurting us. how many wake up calls do we need?? we need to start Jacobs. we need our fastest guy out there. its easy to catch passes when the cornerback is two steps behind you. and i hate to say it, but maybe even try Thrash instead of Gardner. say whatever you want about him, but he doesnt drop balls. the entire NFL knows Gardner and how to stop him. a shakeup at WR could be all we need to open up the running game and getting everything clicking. that and more rollout plays, cuz our guys just take too LONG. |
10-04-2004, 11:46 AM | #2 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Coles looked fine to me and he was open quite a bit yesterday.
Besides, getting open isn't about being fast or quick, it's about understanding the offense and having a good rapport with the QB. That's the main problem right now. Guys are thinking too much and not executing. If speed was the answer we could throw a bunch of Cliff Russells out there. Shaking up the lineup isn't going to accomplish anything except add to the confusion. These guys need all the reps they can get together, they need to figure this thing out together. How can a team get any continuity going with constant changes in the lineup like so many of you are suggesting? To steal a line from one of the best sports movies ever, "My team is on the floor". That's how we have to look at things. |
10-04-2004, 11:48 AM | #3 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartselle, Alabama
Age: 83
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
__________________
John Shaffer National Fantasy Sports Leagues, Inc. Home of "The BEST Game In Town" since 1990 |
|
10-04-2004, 11:54 AM | #4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
not just track speed, but quickness. shedding the bump at the line, turning the corner around, making him commit. these are the exact lateral moves that Coles says hurts the most, and the ones Gardner never really had. Coles was open a couple times over the middle, not really what he's best at, and the results are pretty obvious. drops, hard knocks and fumbles.
every time we go for a pass, its like we pray the QB wont get sacked, and the rarest thing is to see them with a quick release. yeah, its the guys not executing their routes well enough and shaking defenders, but i think that requires quickness they've been lacking. Coles had been open enough to get the ball thrown to him, but when was it ever in stride? our YAC must be the lowest in the league. |
10-04-2004, 11:55 AM | #5 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
The same people who were thinking we would be 12-4 and make the playoffs this year, are now assuming losses. Basically, the truth is that in most cases, successful teams are not built overnight. At the same time, I don't think you can assume just because we haven't played well enough to win the past three weeks, automatically means we are going to lose the next two. In the NFL these days, its usually what you don't expect to happen, which ends up happening.
|
10-04-2004, 12:02 PM | #6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Brunell said that this is the best group of WRs he's ever been around. I don't think it's the WRs. I think its a culmination of offensive players thinking that they don't have to give 100% because someone else is there to pick up the slack. They're just not giving 100% right now, but I have no doubt that its coming - soon.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
10-04-2004, 12:14 PM | #7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Quote:
our speed guy is hurt so we have no vertical threat. Gardner has physical gifts, but only limited talent. what else would make our QBs, and it seems like ONLY the Skins's QBs take so damn LONG??? watch any other NFL game and compare. |
|
10-04-2004, 12:28 PM | #8 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
I think it's all about guys getting on the same page. QB's, WR's, RB's and O-line. It's everyone. Not just the WR's and QB's.
|
10-04-2004, 01:01 PM | #9 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
10-04-2004, 01:21 PM | #10 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Quote:
|
|
10-04-2004, 04:14 PM | #11 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
10-04-2004, 12:32 PM | #12 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
|
I think its a mixture of strategy and poor offensive line play. When you block with 8, you only have 2 receivers amidst a multitude of DBs and they have no shot. Blocking with 8 during a blitz is fine, but then you gotta make 'em pay - Brunell does this sometimes (e.g., on his 4th down completion to Coles yesterday), but not consistently enough. Our 7-8 blockers sometimes had problems against the front 4 of Cleveland, and they didn't even blitz much - that's a waste of manpower.
The O-line didn't give up any sacks, but they're not moving the opposing D-line enough to create holes for Portis or passing lanes for Brunell. Portis needs to pick up his game...he was looking dazed sitting on the sidelines at one point - he will have to be key in the Bmore game if we expect to win. I've thrown in the towel this season as far as playoff expectations are concerned. I hope they use the season to get the offense more smooth, turnover free, and figure out the right QB to run the offense. Brunell was ok yesterday, and can't be held responsible for our TOs, but we need him to be better than just ok. The defense will be fine. IMHO, the key is to keep the team intact for next year....I do believe we will see things start to turn positive in the second half of the season. Still, I shudder to think what will happen when we play in Philly & Dallas. |
10-04-2004, 12:44 PM | #13 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
I think Coach Gibbs wants to get the WRs on the same page and understand their role on this team. I felt that Coles did not have a blow out seasn last year due to his lack of separation from the secondary. Coles has been playing with an injured toe and could have contributed to his lack of speed. McCants is and intricate part of this offense and deserves to get a chance. Imagine how he must have felt when Thrash was named #3 WR after McCants was resigned to contract extension?
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
10-04-2004, 12:46 PM | #14 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
there's a formula to beating the Skins. stack and blitz. rinse, repeat. thats why we keep losing the same way. this only happens because no one respects our air game. and they don't because of bad accuracy from our hurried QBs, and our WRs not getting open. can't be more obvious to me.
quick solution: rollouts, and ACCURATE dumpoffs and screens like Garcia did to our blitzing defense to great effect. right answer: have your receivers be able to shake coverage and be respected enough to doubleteam or at very least play the safeties back and (gasp) play cover instead or blitz/run stop. |
10-04-2004, 01:10 PM | #15 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
One strategy, admittedly laughably unorthodox, is for us to sub QBs when we're in the red zone - send in Ramsey, who is much better at finding a receiver in the endzone than Brunell is (except for his faux pas in the Giants game). Also, send in Mccants and Jacobs over Coles and Gardner when we're in the red zone. I think Taylor Jacobs is the best receiver we have on the team. Coming away with field goals when we're in the red zone is intolerable, especially against a team like Cleveland. |
|
|
|