Very Early 2008 predictions.

[gibbsisgod]

I know its early but this could be fun.

How will the Skins do next year. If they fail is JZ back?

Skins: I say 9-7. Might not be good enough to get back to the playoffs but if they can squeeze out another win somewhere and make it to 10, that may be good enough to win the East. As for the other teams, I can see Dallas being a decent team, but not getting all the lucky bounces they got this year. Philly is no better that a .500 team. The Giants are probabaly the East winners but at no more than 10 wins.

[gibbsisgod]

The teams we play.

Washington Redskins

[724Skinsfan]

18 - 1

[Meks]

i say barring injuries.....with some help in the secondary & on d-line... and the offense picking up the new system fast... we could easily go 11 - 5 here...... i say we def finish either 9-7 or above...

Hail!

[saden1]

6-10 with lots of pain.

[Meks]

^ keep talking like that u deserve to be banned

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

Originally Posted by Meks

^ keep talking like that u deserve to be banned

We don't ban anyone for being pessimistic about our team, we only ban people for being douche bags. Saden is a long time, contributing member.

[BleedBurgundy]

I'm saying 5-11 is realistic, 2-4 in division. If our first team comes out and plays great in pre-season against starting d-units I'll be pleasantly surprised and more hopeful.

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

Somewhere between 0-16 and 16-0. Seriously, I have no clue how well our coaching staff with fare, what free agents we will acquire, what players we will release or trade, who we will draft, what our injury list will look like after the preseason, etc. There are far too many unknowns to predict how we will fare will any accuracy.

[firstdown]

18-1 and Snyder gets bashed.

[skinsguy]

All depends on what personnel changes we make on offense. I say at worst, 7-9 and then going 13-3 in '09 and a Super Bowl Championship.

[MTK]

Since we're tossing out worthless predictions I'll say 19 and F'ing 0

Seriously, the only thing worse than predictions in Feb. are predictions in Jan.

[Campbell17]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Since we're tossing out worthless predictions I'll say 19 and F'ing 0

Seriously, the only thing worse than predictions in Feb. are predictions in Jan.

And the only worse thing than predictions in january is predictions the evening after your teams last december game.

If we have ocho cinco: 10-6
If we dont: 6-10

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Campbell17

And the only worse thing than predictions in january is predictions the evening after your teams last december game.

If we have ocho cinco: 10-6
If we dont: 6-10

That's pretty insane. Chad Johnson replacing Santana in the lineup adds like 1/3 of a win based on last years production.

Unless your are suggesting that he brings Carson Palmer with him...in which case that's still pretty insane, but not quite as bad.

Point is, if you truly think we are a 6 win team, then you can add Ocho Cinco to the mix...and maybe---maybe we can be a 7 win team. A 6-10 prediction takes a totally different roster than a 10-6 prediction.

Unless you think that Johnson is bringing luck over with him.

[Campbell17]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

That's pretty insane. Chad Johnson replacing Santana in the lineup adds like 1/3 of a win based on last years production.

Unless your are suggesting that he brings Carson Palmer with him...in which case that's still pretty insane, but not quite as bad.

Point is, if you truly think we are a 6 win team, then you can add Ocho Cinco to the mix...and maybe---maybe we can be a 7 win team. A 6-10 prediction takes a totally different roster than a 10-6 prediction.

Unless you think that Johnson is bringing luck over with him.

Chad Johnson+Santana Moss+Antwaan Randle El+COOOOley= Receivers like the pats.