Pre Depth Chart Rankings

[DCsports]

Jason Campbell over Tod Collins
and Brandon Lloyd over Randel El

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by DCsports

Im my opinion (only top picks per position)

Offense
QBS
1) Brunell
2) Jason Campbell
3) Tod C.

Recievers
1) Moss
2) Lloyd
3) Randel El

RBS
1)Portis
2)Betts
3)Cartwright

TE's
1)Cooley
2)Fauria

Defense
CBS
1)Springs
2)Rodgers

Safetys
1) Sean Taylor
2) Adam Archuleta
3) Pierson

LBS
1) Marcus Washington
2) Lemar Marshall
3) Rodger Mcintosh

Well gee.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Well gee.

hilarious in its simplicity

[DCsports]

who says gee anyways?!?!?!

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by DCsports

who says gee anyways?!?!?!

Who writes depth charts that only go three players deep anyways?!?!?!

Well gee, like we don't know who the starters are!

I said gee again! Gee, I sure hope I don't have to read another thread like this. Gee, what a waste of time this is. Gee. Gee whiz.

[SmootSmack]

Head coaching staff. The following are some of my crazy, off the wall predictions:

Head Coach/Team President: Joe Gibbs
Assoc. HC Offense: Al Saunders
Assoc. HC Defense: Gregg Williams
Running Backs Coach: Earnest Byner
Wide Receivers Coach: Stan Hixon

I know. It's insane.

[MTK]

LOL is this the official no-brainer thread?

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

LOL is this the official no-brainer thread?

well i don't know... I mean we could talk about the LBs, Who is better Lloyd or ARE? I wonder if this thread will go much farther without talking about JC and Brunell and who should be number 1.

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

well i don't know... I mean we could talk about the LBs, Who is better Lloyd or ARE? I wonder if this thread will go much farther without talking about JC and Brunell and who should be number 1.

Isn't it obvious that Ramsey should be #1 at QB? (Insert sarcastic smirk and cringe awaiting backlash)

[724Skinsfan]

I said "gee" once. Once.

[MonkFan4Life]

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

I said "gee" once. Once.

Hey the "once. ONCE" Is that a Johnny Dangerously quote ? If it is !!!

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Isn't it obvious that Ramsey should be #1 at QB? (Insert sarcastic smirk and cringe awaiting backlash)

I guess you are right, we need to get this son bitch rolling. Not that I believe it but, Brunell is too old to be a starter in this league. Bring on the rook, there is no way we can win a bowl with the old man.

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

well i don't know... I mean we could talk about the LBs, Who is better Lloyd or ARE? I wonder if this thread will go much farther without talking about JC and Brunell and who should be number 1.

I honestly think Lloyd and ARE are about equal, bc they excell in different ways. Since we will be running 2-3+ wide most of the time, I really dont know if there will truly be a 2nd string reciever. I think Lloyd and ARE will rotate when we run two reciever sets, and have about equal playing time, maybe a little bit more with Lloyd.

Sorry guys, trying to bring this thread back down to earth lol.

[Drift Reality]

Originally Posted by hooskins

I honestly think Lloyd and ARE are about equal, bc they excell in different ways. Since we will be running 2-3+ wide most of the time, I really dont know if there will truly be a 2nd string reciever. I think Lloyd and ARE will rotate when we run two reciever sets, and have about equal playing time, maybe a little bit more with Lloyd.

Sorry guys, trying to bring this thread back down to earth lol.

In a conventional two-back offense you basically have a slotback and a split-end (both referred to as wide receivers in popular nomenclature). The split-end lines up on the line of scrimmage whereas the slot-back lines up about 2-3 yards off the line, so he can go in motion. In many conventional sets, they will both position themselves close to the hashes - away from the offensive line but often, the slotback can will position himself directly adjacent to the offensive line.

Because of their positioning, the split-end normally will be asked to run more fly and post patterns while the slotback will run ins, outs, hooks - short to intermmediate patterns. Consequently, you normally want your split-end to be someone who is faster than quick (like Lloyd) and your slotback to be someone who is quicker than fast (like El). In an ideal world, you have someone like Moss, who has both.

My guess is that in a 2-receiver set, you have Cooley lined up at tight-end, Lloyd at split-end and Moss at slotback. If they go with a 3-receiver set, then El will come in for Cooley and play slotback and Moss will move up on the line.

But in most formations you need that classic receiver to play the split-end, which is one of the main reasons they brought in Lloyd.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Drift Reality

In a conventional two-back offense you basically have a slotback and a split-end (both referred to as wide receivers in popular nomenclature). The split-end lines up on the line of scrimmage whereas the slot-back lines up about 2-3 yards off the line, so he can go in motion. In many conventional sets, they will both position themselves close to the hashes - away from the offensive line but often, the slotback can will position himself directly adjacent to the offensive line.

Because of their positioning, the split-end normally will be asked to run more fly and post patterns while the slotback will run ins, outs, hooks - short to intermmediate patterns. Consequently, you normally want your split-end to be someone who is faster than quick (like Lloyd) and your slotback to be someone who is quicker than fast (like El). In an ideal world, you have someone like Moss, who has both.

My guess is that in a 2-receiver set, you have Cooley lined up at tight-end, Lloyd at split-end and Moss at slotback. If they go with a 3-receiver set, then El will come in for Cooley and play slotback and Moss will move up on the line.

But in most formations you need that classic receiver to play the split-end, which is one of the main reasons they brought in Lloyd.

Have we heard who the official "fullback" is going to be? And is the H-back a feature in the Al Saunders offense?