WR Core Makeup

saden1 · 03-12-2006, 01:41 PM

Many will be disappointed and many will be jubilant but this much is true, Taylor Jacobs future with the Redskins is nearing the end of its life-cycle, especially if the Redskins are still pursuing another receiver. Will Jacobs be the first WR cut or will it be Thrash or Patten?

When Taylor get the axe I'm planning on sending him a "Good Luck" card. Who in here will sigh it and what would you write on it?

Pocket$ $traight · 03-12-2006, 01:43 PM

Jacobs and Thrash. I have to think you give Patten a shot as the #3.

You heard it here first. Patten will have 800 yards as the #3 next year! I really like the Redskin wideouts right now. Now, one injury and you have '05 all over again.

MTK · 03-12-2006, 01:43 PM

I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already.

Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006:

1. Moss
2. Lloyd
3. Randle El
4. Patten
5. Thrash

Bozzy · 03-12-2006, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already.

Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006:

1. Moss
2. Lloyd
3. Randle El
4. Patten
5. Thrash

Not to mention that there'd still be Chris Cooley or Clinton Portis getting open.

RedskinPete · 03-12-2006, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Not to mention that there'd still be Chris Cooley or Clinton Portis getting open.

Yes Cooley and Portis are going to see a lot more passes in a Al O!!!! Burnell will have a arsenal of weapons! Run and pass at well and keep the D from having to save the O every game I say!!!!!

GoSkins! · 03-12-2006, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already.

Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006:

1. Moss
2. Lloyd
3. Randle El
4. Patten
5. Thrash

I think that Randle El wont be signed. It looks like the Skins brought him in to make sure, if Lloyd fell through, we would have a guy we could make sure signed before he left the park. Once the Lloyd deal was done, I think that the Randle El deal became a routine visit. How much can we really justify paying a third receiver? Patten as a number three would be just fine.

Moss
Lloyd
Patten
Thrash
???

drew54 · 03-12-2006, 02:42 PM

Moss
Lloyd
Patten
Thrash
??? = Rookie, Fourth round or later.

SmootSmack · 03-12-2006, 02:47 PM

If they don't sign Randle El, then I think Antonio Brown stays as the #5 WR. Though he'll primarily serve as a KR. Unless they decide to keep 6 wide receivers in which case Brown (or maybe Farriss) becomes the #6 WR.

STPainmaker · 03-12-2006, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

Many will be disappointed and many will be jubilant but this much is true, Taylor Jacobs future with the Redskins is nearing the end of its life-cycle, especially if the Redskins are still pursuing another receiver. Will Jacobs be the first WR cut or will it be Thrash or Patten?

When Taylor get the axe I'm planning on sending him a "Good Luck" card. Who in here will sigh it and what would you write on it?

Dear Taylor,

I have friends in Frankfurt please say hi when your dropping balls in NFL Europe. I also have friends who own a gas station say hi to them after you get cut from NFL Europe.

Heart of Burgundy & Gold · 03-12-2006, 03:35 PM

as matty said i cant believe he hasnt been cut yet. he was finally given a chance to prove he belongs in the NFL, but blew it completly. i personally think he doesnt have the mental balls to be at this level.

EXoffender · 03-12-2006, 03:58 PM

I was hoping the opposite. I thought Jacobs should've been given another chance. Since Patten was given $4 million or so in signing bonus it wouldn't be a good deal to release him this year. Jacobs lacks cofidence. Moss and Lloyd don't.

giacomo2 · 03-12-2006, 04:13 PM

Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaterrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatorrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!

PorterHouse · 03-12-2006, 04:06 PM

I think if we get Randel El, Patten becomes a cap casualty and Thrash stays on as a special teamer. Taylor gets another chance. we are gonna need the money.

EXoffender · 03-12-2006, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PorterHouse

I think if we get Randel El, Patten becomes a cap casualty and Thrash stays on as a special teamer. Taylor gets another chance. we are gonna need the money.

Next year, yes. Unless Snyder wants to pay Patten $4 million for nothing.

That Guy · 03-12-2006, 06:40 PM

i think trash, brown and jacobs may all go cause it'd save us 1.9mill. (brown is now ~500k with the new cba, jacobs can be dumped at anytime and treated as a post june 1 cut, saving 460k, and trash saves 875k).

2mill is a lot of money for zero return and could be used to get 1 player who isn't terrible.

03-12-2006, 01:41 PM	#1
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	WR Core Makeup Many will be disappointed and many will be jubilant but this much is true, Taylor Jacobs future with the Redskins is nearing the end of its life-cycle, especially if the Redskins are still pursuing another receiver. Will Jacobs be the first WR cut or will it be Thrash or Patten? When Taylor get the axe I'm planning on sending him a "Good Luck" card. Who in here will sigh it and what would you write on it? __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

03-12-2006, 01:43 PM	#2
Pocket$ $traight Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 48 Posts: 4,261	Re: WR Core Makeup Jacobs and Thrash. I have to think you give Patten a shot as the #3. You heard it here first. Patten will have 800 yards as the #3 next year! I really like the Redskin wideouts right now. Now, one injury and you have '05 all over again.

03-12-2006, 02:42 PM	#7
drew54 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: IOWA Age: 42 Posts: 1,324	Re: WR Core Makeup Moss Lloyd Patten Thrash ??? = Rookie, Fourth round or later. __________________ No pressure, no diamonds.

03-12-2006, 02:47 PM	#8
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: WR Core Makeup If they don't sign Randle El, then I think Antonio Brown stays as the #5 WR. Though he'll primarily serve as a KR. Unless they decide to keep 6 wide receivers in which case Brown (or maybe Farriss) becomes the #6 WR. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-12-2006, 03:35 PM	#10
Heart of Burgundy & Gold Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Williamsburg,Va Age: 57 Posts: 14	Re: WR Core Makeup as matty said i cant believe he hasnt been cut yet. he was finally given a chance to prove he belongs in the NFL, but blew it completly. i personally think he doesnt have the mental balls to be at this level. __________________ Hey Ken Harvey,you doing anything on sundays this year?

03-12-2006, 01:43 PM	#3
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	Re: WR Core Makeup I'm surprised Jacobs wasn't axed already. Thrash seems to be the most safe out of the bunch since he's a quality special teams guy. If we pick up Randle El then Patten could easily be on the bubble, but I doubt it. I could see our WRs looking like this in 2006: 1. Moss 2. Lloyd 3. Randle El 4. Patten 5. Thrash __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-12-2006, 03:58 PM	#11
EXoffender The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Norfolk, Va Posts: 1,046	Re: WR Core Makeup I was hoping the opposite. I thought Jacobs should've been given another chance. Since Patten was given $4 million or so in signing bonus it wouldn't be a good deal to release him this year. Jacobs lacks cofidence. Moss and Lloyd don't.

03-12-2006, 04:13 PM	#12
giacomo2 Camp Scrub Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 61	Re: WR Core Makeup Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaterrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatorrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!

03-12-2006, 04:06 PM	#13
PorterHouse No new threads for you Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 48 Posts: 230	Re: WR Core Makeup I think if we get Randel El, Patten becomes a cap casualty and Thrash stays on as a special teamer. Taylor gets another chance. we are gonna need the money.

03-12-2006, 06:40 PM	#15
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: WR Core Makeup i think trash, brown and jacobs may all go cause it'd save us 1.9mill. (brown is now ~500k with the new cba, jacobs can be dumped at anytime and treated as a post june 1 cut, saving 460k, and trash saves 875k). 2mill is a lot of money for zero return and could be used to get 1 player who isn't terrible.

WR Core Makeup

Locker Room Main Forum