![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 54
Posts: 907
|
ESPN power rankings...Skins @ #18
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking
I don't agree with it, but with our track record, I can understand how they can have the Skins at #18....Gibbs alone probably brought us out of the bottom 10. But Atlanta at #7? WTF??? Yeah, Vick is good, but come on! They have a rookie head coach, and contrary to what many believe, one man can't make that much of a difference. Let me put it another way, with the same team (hypothetically), who would you rather have...Gibbs as HC or Vick as QB? I'd choose Gibbs, no question. (not that these rankings really mean anything, but it's a very slow NFL news time of year...) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,812
|
Quote:
as relates to us being #18, i think it has more to do with them being skeptical with all of our other "great" offseasons of recent memory resulting in nothing but unrest in redskins faithful. they had a link up for fans to rank the teams in what orders they believe they should be and after doing so(i had the skins at 6 or 7), i guess it averages it out with other votes cuz it had the skins at 14. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 528
|
Hey i think we got a justifible rank. As the past few years could attest too, free agent spending does't make you better. So there's no reason to think where gonna be incredible. The only x factor of course is Gibbs. We'll have to see. I'm still critical of our d-line. I think thats really gonona hinder or defense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 72
Posts: 1,812
|
No worries Mate!
No worries Mate! That just means teams will look past us before they play us! It can only work in our favor.
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,812
|
plus didn't we end last season ranked like 26 or something like that so an 8 spot jump just on gibbs alone seems about right but we all know we'll be in the top 10 by the end of the season. it's all about how u finish, not how u start.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
|
I agree that Atlanta seems signifigantly overated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 96
|
Pre season power rankings mean about as much as a steaming pile of $#*&
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Age: 62
Posts: 141
|
Skins009,
I echo your sentiments about the D-line. It will be our shortcoming all season which is why I thought we should trade down in the draft and get an extra pick and a D lineman, although with Gibbs running the draft and his track record who really could argue with Taylor. DJDunick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 461
|
they are saying that vick is gonna play more "quarterback" this year and less runningback. i think that hurts atlanta more. i despise vick, but if he can run as much as he passes they are a better team. the west coast may help with shorter passes, but that doesnt really give him time to use his legs IMO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Let's look at Atlanta's offense.
QB: Vick (Best in the game) TE: Alge Crumpler (Top 5 in the game for sure) RB: TJ Duckett and Warrick Dunn, quite a punishing duo. WRs: Peerless Price, Dez White, Michael Jenkins, Brian Finnerin. Although this isn't the greatest group, Peerless Price can definitly play when he's not doubles all day long. Hopefully Dez White will finally fulfill his potential and Michael Jenkins could be a serious threat. Their biggest question mark is their defense. Which they did try to correct with a slew of new DB's. I think 7 is high for them, but they do have a high octane offense in a fairly weak division. Don't be suprised if they do well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 37
Posts: 549
|
how can you say vick is the best in the game?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,812
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 49
Posts: 9,534
|
Quote:
01- 44.2% 02- 54.9% 03- 50.0% car- 52.2% (has 634 career attempts) How in the world can you possibly say he's accurate? In fact, I'd go so far to say that he sucks inside the pocket. He has shown me nothing more than a glorified Kordell Stewart to this point. Don't make yourself believe because he's the fastest QB ever he's a great QB. That's not the case. He is way below average in terms of comp.%. I saw someone say how WONDERFUL he was vs the Packers in 02. Not true. He was 13 for 25 (only 52%) for only 117 yards. His defense (one of the best in the league that year) is what won that game...Vicks running ability certainly helped, but his passing ability was more of a liability than an assett. Don't get me wrong, I like Vick. If he can get a hold of a real good QB coach, he might be soemthing special, if not, he will never be anything extra special back there other than his scrambling ability.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,812
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|