Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The real concern: turnovers

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2005, 10:13 AM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
The real concern: turnovers

Forget all this talk about the blown calls by the refs and the defensive breakdowns, the real story of the Bucs game and of the entire season so far has been our horrible turnover ratio. We're now at -11 I believe, playoff teams do not give the ball up as much as the Skins do right now.

If the Skins are going to make a serious playoff push, they need to start winning the turnover battle. They spotted the Bucs some really easy points early on and that set the tone for the rest of the game.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:22 AM   #2
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Most definitely. At least the team had enough fight to not give up after those 3 early turnovers on the road. Honestly, I think it's coming down to us having no pass rush. Someone mentioned earlier that Nic Clemons always seems to get some kind of push. I'd really like to see more of him (barring he doesn't get any more 15 yarders).
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:25 AM   #3
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 59
Posts: 594
Re: The real concern: turnovers

You're exactly right. Same story in the losses at Denver and Kansas City. Turnovers led directly to points in those games, too. Whether the INTs were Brunell's fault of the receivers', Brunell needs to stop fumbling when he's hit.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:24 AM   #4
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: The real concern: turnovers

It seems like Brunell is averaging a fumble a game.

Guys are getting around the edges even with help from our TEs and HBacks.

You can't blame Brunell for those two INT's. Patten should've caught the first one, and on the second they basically got a lucky bounce.

We could've won at least 3 more games if it wasn't for the turnovers.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:29 AM   #5
hurrykaine
Impact Rookie
 
hurrykaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
It seems like Brunell is averaging a fumble a game.

Guys are getting around the edges even with help from our TEs and HBacks.

You can't blame Brunell for those two INT's. Patten should've caught the first one, and on the second they basically got a lucky bounce.

We could've won at least 3 more games if it wasn't for the turnovers.
Amen. Brunell = 1 fumble per game. It is getting annoyingly costly. He has got to protect the ball better. I started another thread on this, but due to the choice of a poor title, that thread has been misconstrued as a Brunell vs Ramsey thread.
hurrykaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:29 AM   #6
hurrykaine
Impact Rookie
 
hurrykaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
It seems like Brunell is averaging a fumble a game.

Guys are getting around the edges even with help from our TEs and HBacks.

You can't blame Brunell for those two INT's. Patten should've caught the first one, and on the second they basically got a lucky bounce.

We could've won at least 3 more games if it wasn't for the turnovers.
Amen. Brunell = 1 fumble per game. It is getting annoyingly costly. He has got to protect the ball better. I started another thread on this, but due to the choice of a poor title, that thread has been misconstrued as a Brunell vs Ramsey thread.
hurrykaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:25 AM   #7
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Yes, they need to create more turnovers on D and eliminate them on O. Another point is that the skins D has gone 4 weeks without a sack. Not good.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:26 AM   #8
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: The real concern: turnovers

They sacked McNabb twice
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:29 AM   #9
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: The real concern: turnovers

I am begining to think the Skins are a little like the Rams from a few years ago. We can move the ball, turn it over some, still score, but have no D. Probably end up around 8-8 or 9-7 and not make the playoffs. Exciting to watch, but you don't end up going anywhere.
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:29 AM   #10
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: The real concern: turnovers

You have to give the Bucs some credit though....when we did put pressure on Simms, they picked everything up and thats when the big plays downfield happened.

I think it would've made a hell of difference if Taylor was in there.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:33 AM   #11
hurrykaine
Impact Rookie
 
hurrykaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
You have to give the Bucs some credit though....when we did put pressure on Simms, they picked everything up and thats when the big plays downfield happened.

I think it would've made a hell of difference if Taylor was in there.
Not to mention Griffin.
hurrykaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:37 AM   #12
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Quote:
Originally Posted by hurrykaine
Not to mention Griffin.

True. With the way Salave'a was playing....just imagine if Griffin was there...
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:57 AM   #13
LadyT
Special Teams
 
LadyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 219
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Brunell had a third pass that was almost picked off by the Bucs. Also, didn't he fumble and we recovered it in addition to his fumble that the Bucs recovered?

These are the same types of things that got Ramsey benched.

The offense gave up the ball way too many times during the first half and that kept the Bucs in the game.

So, there is blame to go all around, not just with the "D".
LadyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 11:02 AM   #14
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Bucs 14 points on turnovers vs. Redskins 8 points on turnovers. Plain and simple, the turnovers have to stop.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 02:04 PM   #15
railcon56
Impact Rookie
 
railcon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
Re: The real concern: turnovers

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyT
Brunell had a third pass that was almost picked off by the Bucs. Also, didn't he fumble and we recovered it in addition to his fumble that the Bucs recovered?

These are the same types of things that got Ramsey benched.

The offense gave up the ball way too many times during the first half and that kept the Bucs in the game.

So, there is blame to go all around, not just with the "D".
I could not agree more
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!!
railcon56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.32830 seconds with 10 queries