Redskins positional review: tight ends

MTK · 01-14-2012, 11:37 AM

Better or worse than 2010: This one is tricky because tight end was all over the place. Fred Davis was better and explosive. But Chris Cooley was never healthy and therefore not the same threat. They combined for 98 catches and six touchdowns in 2010; 67 catches and three scores in 2011. Plus Davis was then suspended for the final four games. So the final verdict: Worse.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: Redskins positional review: tight ends | John Keim | NFL | Washington Examiner

01-14-2012, 11:37 AM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	Redskins positional review: tight ends Better or worse than 2010: This one is tricky because tight end was all over the place. Fred Davis was better and explosive. But Chris Cooley was never healthy and therefore not the same threat. They combined for 98 catches and six touchdowns in 2010; 67 catches and three scores in 2011. Plus Davis was then suspended for the final four games. So the final verdict: Worse. Read more at the Washington Examiner: Redskins positional review: tight ends \| John Keim \| NFL \| Washington Examiner __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Redskins positional review: tight ends

Redskins News