The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good

bigm29 · 03-01-2009, 10:38 PM

Next Task: Filling Team's Remaining Holes - Redskins Insider

"The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good, believing he was the weakest link on a unit that broke down in the second half."

sounds like they are going Oline with the 13th pick. Thats good news.

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 10:51 PM

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

ncskinsfanatic · 03-01-2009, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

It was actually jason Reid, Ja La is on break lol.

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ncskinsfanatic

It was actually jason Reid, Ja La is on break lol.

imadork... well it read like a JLC article anyway.

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

Sounds like what I wrote in the other thread.

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 10:55 PM

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

SmootSmack · 03-01-2009, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

Ruhskins · 03-01-2009, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

So his stench can take out the d-linemen?

SFREDSKIN · 03-01-2009, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

I rather have Jansen and give him another chance. The only reason I say this is, if Jansen does get cut then I would sign Runyan and give him a 1 year contract and plug the whole for this year.

WaldSkins · 03-01-2009, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

Jansen doesn't have a commercial with ford.

GusFrerotte · 03-01-2009, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Like your ideas, but not sure about eating salary cap $$$ with the recent signings.

PS. Can any of you guys tell me about the neighborhoods near Bolling AFB? I am looking at making the big move to DC from Detroit and looking at potential apartments.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-02-2009, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Since none of these things is going to happen I won't spend too much time with it.

If they draft a lineman at 13 it HAS to be a tackle. They don't need a center right now, they need a tackle. Next year is a different story.

If they signed Runyan, Vinny should be fired immediately. Jansen is hopefully going to be the backup and then he is gone next year. They aren't cutting anyone who would count against the cap this year. (One of the reasons that trading Rogers for a pick(s) made zero sense)

SFREDSKIN · 03-02-2009, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

If they signed Runyan, Vinny should be fired immediately. Jansen is hopefully going to be the backup and then he is gone next year. They aren't cutting anyone who would count against the cap this year. (One of the reasons that trading Rogers for a pick(s) made zero sense)

I posted this cause a lot of people in this forum want Jansen gone. Personally I want him to be given one more chance, as for signing Runyan, it would have to be a 1 year contract just to fill the hole if they decide to cut Jansen. Runyan is in his mid 30's and can still play and I just don't see people lining up to signing him unless it's for the vet minimum in which you don't break the bank if you draft someone with the 13th pick. We just spent 180mil on 3 players and our cap space is close, especially after the draft. My theory is you trade down get Mack instead of some questionable T and fill the position the next year.

Ruhskins · 03-01-2009, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Sounds like what I wrote in the other thread.

I didn't see anything about the Giants D-line destroying us in this article.

The Goat · 03-01-2009, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I didn't see anything about the Giants D-line destroying us in this article.

03-01-2009, 10:38 PM	#1
bigm29 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ Age: 36 Posts: 353	The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good Next Task: Filling Team's Remaining Holes - Redskins Insider "The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good, believing he was the weakest link on a unit that broke down in the second half." sounds like they are going Oline with the 13th pick. Thats good news. __________________ Hail Redskins!!!

03-01-2009, 10:51 PM	#2
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,662	Re: The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here... __________________ 24-34

03-01-2009, 10:55 PM	#6
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	Re: The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010. __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good

Locker Room Main Forum