Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2007, 10:35 AM   #1
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Is Smoot helping or hurting us in the secondary?

It seems he is constantly getting burned either by speed or by a move. He had a nice deflection in the end zone yesterday, but he was playing catchup on the play. When the ball is in the air, he is usually trying to find his man, not the ball.

That said, has he cost us that much? How many times has he given up a TD, or the big play that leads to a score? (I don't know the answer to this - just asking). He also is probably the best option (especially with Rogers injured).

I like Smoot - I think that, since his return, he has been a positive influence on the Skins. However, I'm just not sure about his skills out there.

So, what do you think? Where are the polls?
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:35 AM   #2
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

I think he's an asset. I think he's a GREAT cover corner.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:36 AM   #3
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

I thought he played great last night.

I don't know why anyone would even ask if he's a liability to tell you the truth.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:39 AM   #4
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I thought he played great last night.

I don't know why anyone would even ask if he's a liability to tell you the truth.
I agree. I often wonder about people's understanding of football sometimes. How anyone could think he played anything but well last night if beyond me.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:40 AM   #5
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I agree. I often wonder about people's understanding of football sometimes. How anyone could think he played anything but well last night if beyond me.
Seriously.

What's next?

A "What's wrong with Portis" thread?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:45 AM   #6
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I agree. I often wonder about people's understanding of football sometimes. How anyone could think he played anything but well last night if beyond me.
I never said he didn't play well in last night's game. Please read the whole post before starting with the ad hominem attacks. I'm putting the question out there now that we've had Smoot back for (almost) an entire season.
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:52 AM   #7
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by onlydarksets View Post
I never said he didn't play well in last night's game. Please read the whole post before starting with the ad hominem attacks. I'm putting the question out there now that we've had Smoot back for (almost) an entire season.
Blah blah blah. You made a thread questioning how good Smoot is the morning after he shut down one of the NFC's best WR. That makes no sense. He is good enough.

I just wonder when everyone will realize we can't have All-Pros at every spot on the field.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:54 AM   #8
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Blah blah blah. You made a thread questioning how good Smoot is the morning after he shut down one of the NFC's best WR. That makes no sense. He is good enough.

I just wonder when everyone will realize we can't have All-Pros at every spot on the field.
If anything this thread is just really bad timing.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:56 AM   #9
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Blah blah blah.
Very articulate.

For everyone - I'm guessing people feel this is a "pissing on my good feeling" thread. That wasn't my intent, so take that for what it's worth.

I still don't understand the backlash, but I can't argue with democracy. I wouldn't retract anything I posted, but I can see the timing was interpreted as bad. Just don't take it personally.
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 05:52 PM   #10
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by onlydarksets View Post
I never said he didn't play well in last night's game. Please read the whole post before starting with the ad hominem attacks. I'm putting the question out there now that we've had Smoot back for (almost) an entire season.
Remember Smoot missed several key games this year including the game with the Giants. Smoot has done a superb job with feeling in for Carlos Rodgers. Burress had his way with Rodgers in the first game. Smoot has been my favorite corner outside of Darrell Green and Vernon Dean. The man plays with a passion. Remember the loss to the Bills and you will see the heart of a wounded lion who has played valiantly for his fallen comrade.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 06:44 PM   #11
atomicnixon
Special Teams
 
atomicnixon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 174
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I thought he played great last night.

I don't know why anyone would even ask if he's a liability to tell you the truth.
He may not be Champ Bailey, but he's way better than Walt Harris (while in WAS), Kenny Wright, Mike Rumph and so on...
atomicnixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 07:19 PM   #12
railcon56
Impact Rookie
 
railcon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I thought he played great last night.

I don't know why anyone would even ask if he's a liability to tell you the truth.
Beats me .... I think he has played as good or better than anyone on the team ...lately ..I mean the last 3 games......
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!!
railcon56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:37 AM   #13
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Because he tends to be out of position, and doesn't have the speed to keep up with most #1 receivers.
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:38 AM   #14
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Umm ok.

Guess I saw a different game.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 10:40 AM   #15
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?

Plus, my grandmother could have played corner last night, what with the winds. Still, Smoot was out of position at least a few times.

Again, though, this is a results-oriented league. He may be out of position and his assignments may make catches that Springs would have stopped, but did it hurt us? I don't think it has, but I don't have empirical evidence for that.
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.17880 seconds with 10 queries