|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-17-2007, 10:35 AM | #1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Is Smoot helping or hurting us in the secondary?
It seems he is constantly getting burned either by speed or by a move. He had a nice deflection in the end zone yesterday, but he was playing catchup on the play. When the ball is in the air, he is usually trying to find his man, not the ball. That said, has he cost us that much? How many times has he given up a TD, or the big play that leads to a score? (I don't know the answer to this - just asking). He also is probably the best option (especially with Rogers injured). I like Smoot - I think that, since his return, he has been a positive influence on the Skins. However, I'm just not sure about his skills out there. So, what do you think? Where are the polls?
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
12-17-2007, 10:35 AM | #2 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I think he's an asset. I think he's a GREAT cover corner.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
12-17-2007, 10:36 AM | #3 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I thought he played great last night.
I don't know why anyone would even ask if he's a liability to tell you the truth. |
12-17-2007, 10:39 AM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I agree. I often wonder about people's understanding of football sometimes. How anyone could think he played anything but well last night if beyond me.
|
12-17-2007, 10:40 AM | #5 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
What's next? A "What's wrong with Portis" thread? |
|
12-17-2007, 10:45 AM | #6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I never said he didn't play well in last night's game. Please read the whole post before starting with the ad hominem attacks. I'm putting the question out there now that we've had Smoot back for (almost) an entire season.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
12-17-2007, 10:52 AM | #7 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
I just wonder when everyone will realize we can't have All-Pros at every spot on the field. |
|
12-17-2007, 10:54 AM | #8 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
If anything this thread is just really bad timing.
|
12-17-2007, 10:56 AM | #9 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Very articulate.
For everyone - I'm guessing people feel this is a "pissing on my good feeling" thread. That wasn't my intent, so take that for what it's worth. I still don't understand the backlash, but I can't argue with democracy. I wouldn't retract anything I posted, but I can see the timing was interpreted as bad. Just don't take it personally.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
12-17-2007, 05:52 PM | #10 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Remember Smoot missed several key games this year including the game with the Giants. Smoot has done a superb job with feeling in for Carlos Rodgers. Burress had his way with Rodgers in the first game. Smoot has been my favorite corner outside of Darrell Green and Vernon Dean. The man plays with a passion. Remember the loss to the Bills and you will see the heart of a wounded lion who has played valiantly for his fallen comrade.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
12-17-2007, 06:44 PM | #11 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 174
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
|
12-17-2007, 07:19 PM | #12 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Beats me .... I think he has played as good or better than anyone on the team ...lately ..I mean the last 3 games......
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
12-17-2007, 10:37 AM | #13 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Because he tends to be out of position, and doesn't have the speed to keep up with most #1 receivers.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
12-17-2007, 10:38 AM | #14 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,496
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Umm ok.
Guess I saw a different game. |
12-17-2007, 10:40 AM | #15 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Plus, my grandmother could have played corner last night, what with the winds. Still, Smoot was out of position at least a few times.
Again, though, this is a results-oriented league. He may be out of position and his assignments may make catches that Springs would have stopped, but did it hurt us? I don't think it has, but I don't have empirical evidence for that.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|