Is Scott Pioli available after the season?

[Bill B]

I have not been able to find any information on the net other than Pioli's contract was set to expire after the 2006 draft.

Does anyone know if he signed a long term extension with the Patriots?

If not is there any way the Redskins can get him?

[hesscl34]

Yep, just have Snyder write the check and he's ours... Not so sure that's a good thing...

[Bill B]

Originally Posted by hesscl34

Yep, just have Snyder write the check and he's ours... Not so sure that's a good thing...

You wouldn't take Pioli over the braintrust currently at Redskin Park?

One thing is for sure though is if Pioli or another proven GM came here - I would only want him if he was given assurance that Dan Synder would not be involved in any way in football personelle operations other than to sign his name on the dotted line when Pioli/the unnamed professional GM tells him.

How did Synder get all the money before buying the Redskins - he outbids himself for free agents like Archuletta!

[SmootSmack]

I really don't think Gibbs would be so willing to cede control of picking players. It's what he wants to do

[dmek25]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I really don't think Gibbs would be so willing to cede control of picking players. It's what he wants to do

i dont know if coach gibbs would stop something that he thought would make the redskins better

[skinsfan69]

I think all this GM talk is premature. Things are going to stay the same around Ashburn until Gibbs leaves. He likes Vinny. And what Joe wants he gets.

[MTK]

I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

And he's probably kicking himself for it! But, at least he can show people that although his offense wasn't great and too conservatives (as what I heard over and over again last year) at least he's proved that it can work and probably would've worked just fine again this year with our current talent.

[hesscl34]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

And he's probably kicking himself for it! But, at least he can show people that although his offense wasn't great and too conservatives (as what I heard over and over again last year) at least he's proved that it can work and probably would've worked just fine again this year with our current talent.

My father used to scream at the tv while I was growing up "Why are you so conservative" when talking about Gibbs. It's his game. It's how he plays. He doens't take too many chances, but he's won 3 SBs, so he's doing something right.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

[GhettoDogAllStars]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

Good post. I don't think Gibbs wants to have a boss.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

great post. I would agree but See T. Boswell's article from today's washpost, says Gibbs is open to hiring a gm.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by freddyg12

great post. I would agree but See T. Boswell's article from today's washpost, says Gibbs is open to hiring a gm.

I have this feeling that it will be more a ceremonial title than anything else. I mean I think the decisions will still go through Gibbs

[Beemnseven]

Let's see...

• Giving up a 3rd round draft choice for Mark Brunell who was going to be cut by Jacksonville anyway...

• Giving up Champ Bailey AND a 2nd round choice for Clinton Portis...

• Giving up a 3rd and 4th round draft choice, plus a $10 million bonus for Brandon Lloyd who won't come anywhere near his career averages for catches...

• Giving Randle El a $10 million signing bonus when we already had 3 capable kick returners in Thrash, Betts, and Cartwright...

• Giving up a 3rd round choice for T.J. Duckett who won't get more than 50 carries for the season...

• Trading up in the '06 draft for Rocky McIntosh, losing next year's 2nd round choice when he can't even unseat Warrick Holdman or any other of the incompetent buffoons we have playing on defense...

• Adam Archuleta -- do we need an explanation about him?

• The defense is old, needs to be completely overhauled and gutted, and we haven't nearly enough draft picks next year to address a third of the needs on that side of the field.

If Joe Gibbs 'the GM' cannot see what sort of a wreck this team's personnel shape is in, then perhaps we have overestimated him.

[paulskinsfan]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Let's see...

• Giving up a 3rd round draft choice for Mark Brunell who was going to be cut by Jacksonville anyway...

• Giving up Champ Bailey AND a 2nd round choice for Clinton Portis...

• Giving up a 3rd and 4th round draft choice, plus a $10 million bonus for Brandon Lloyd who won't come anywhere near his career averages for catches...

• Giving Randle El a $10 million signing bonus when we already had 3 capable kick returners in Thrash, Betts, and Cartwright...

• Giving up a 3rd round choice for T.J. Duckett who won't get more than 50 carries for the season...

• Trading up in the '06 draft for Rocky McIntosh, losing next year's 2nd round choice when he can't even unseat Warrick Holdman or any other of the incompetent buffoons we have playing on defense...

• Adam Archuleta -- do we need an explanation about him?

• The defense is old, needs to be completely overhauled and gutted, and we haven't nearly enough draft picks next year to address a third of the needs on that side of the field.

If Joe Gibbs 'the GM' cannot see what sort of a wreck this team's personnel shape is in, then perhaps we have overestimated him.

GREAT POST....duck and cover man, duck and cover.