Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2006, 09:00 AM   #1
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

SI.com - Writers - Dr. Z's Power Rankings: Bengals, Seahawks, Chargers all take nasty spill - Thursday October 5, 2006 1:01AM

Interesting... Hopefully we prove him right, for once.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 09:14 AM   #2
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Oh crap. I don't like recognition.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 09:28 AM   #3
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 54
Posts: 2,015
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Once again we should hold steadfast....rankings don't mean shit!
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 10:21 AM   #4
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcjr14 View Post
Once again we should hold steadfast....rankings don't mean shit!
I agree
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 10:31 AM   #5
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

rankings are good when we are ranked high, they suck when we are not. im just kidding, they always suck. thats why they play the games, just do it on the field. hey, i did that once.....
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 01:30 PM   #6
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 54
Posts: 2,015
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
rankings are good when we are ranked high, they suck when we are not. im just kidding, they always suck. thats why they play the games, just do it on the field. hey, i did that once.....
I "did it" on the golf course once....hehehehe
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 10:34 AM   #7
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Take heart boys, we are still behind the Broncos! (Statistically, not even a top 20 team)
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 11:24 AM   #8
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Take heart boys, we are still behind the Broncos! (Statistically, not even a top 20 team)
they always start slow (thanks jake plummer) and end up ranked high... i think in 2004 they were like 4 in offense and 5 in defense, but i don't remember how they did last year.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 11:03 AM   #9
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Yeah, it's something fun to read but they don't mean a whole lot. Rankings are always based on how teams have done recently, but in reality you're only as good as your next game.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 11:43 AM   #10
Misterbillysells
Camp Scrub
 
Misterbillysells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 80
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

But he also pick us to lose to the giants on sunday (see the giants ranking)...so dont be scurred we still need to prove him wrong as usual...and we will
Misterbillysells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 01:34 PM   #11
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

It's about damn time!!!

Winning does equal respect! So true!
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 02:23 PM   #12
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

I agree with him about Rock becoming a serious threat as a kick returner, but I don't think a jump like that is warranted by winning 2 and only beating 1 good opponent. I do think that this team is in the top half of the league, but top 10? Not quite yet. I like the improvement I've seen, but it's pretty much all for naught if they drop this one the Giants.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 10:46 PM   #13
CanadianSkin
Special Teams
 
CanadianSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Age: 48
Posts: 226
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

We may have got respect, but did you read what he wrote about the Jags? Here it is...

Jacksonville Jaguars (2-2)
Their Monday-nighter against the Steelers was a classic heavyweight fight. But then the Redskins lit up this mighty Jacksonville defense to the tune of 36 points and 481 yards. It was like Sugar Ray Leonard knocking out Mike Tyson.

So he may have moved us up, just mainly so he does not look as stupid as he did last week if you read the start of his column.... Let's just go out and beat those damn Giants and who cares where they put us..

The bigger question is who do you want to win the Philly/Dallas game?
__________________
HTTR from North of the 49th!!!!!

Two things I love.... Canada and the Redskins!!!!
CanadianSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 10:49 AM   #14
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

Well stated, Matty. Right on the money. It's a trap.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2006, 02:07 PM   #15
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
Re: WOW - Dr.Z's Power Rankings (10/05/06) Have Me Speechless

any ranking that moves a team up from 21 to 10 because of one single game is stupid. Dr. Z sucks at analyzing the nfl and the drastic changes week to week in his rankings reflect that. It pisses me off that he actually gets paid to make stupid predictions and reflections. You have to remember his dumb ass said we would win 3 games last year.
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.60412 seconds with 10 queries