|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-20-2006, 04:14 PM | #1 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Best blockers: Football Scientist
A good block is a successful block
I'm not going to post the entire article since it's an ESPN Insider article, but just to sum it up KC Joyner rated out the best blockers in the league using a few different categories and he came up with what he calls the blocking success percentage, or one way to rate the general success/failure of each block. Here's how the best rated according to his blocking percentage system: 1. C. Samuels Washington 94.8% 2. S. Locklear Seattle 94.4 3. K. Barry Green Bay 94.2 4. C. Villarrial Buffalo 91.8 5. B. Hamilton Denver 91.6 6. D. Dockery Washington 91.1 7. J. Peters Buffalo 90.9 8. R. Brown Chicago 90.8 9. V. Riley Houston 90.5 10. B. Olson Tennessee 90.2 |
06-20-2006, 04:18 PM | #2 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
That's interesting about Dockery being so high, especially since I would think the majority of us would have said that Thomas is better. Last year was a great step for Docker since he seemed to cut way back on the stupid penalties.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
06-20-2006, 04:34 PM | #3 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
if you had to choose betwen the 2 you cant tell me you would take dock over thomas, can you? in docks defense i should say that i have noticed a huge improvement over the last season compared to early on. he was always good for 2 penaties a game whether it be false start or holding.but you dont hear his name called that often and that is usually a good thing. |
|
06-20-2006, 04:44 PM | #4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 40
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Cool! Only Buffalo and the 'Skins have 2 players in the top 10!
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
06-22-2006, 12:43 AM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
|
|
06-20-2006, 04:46 PM | #6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
where is god's gift to o-lineman hutchinson?
|
06-20-2006, 04:49 PM | #7 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
|
|
06-20-2006, 04:58 PM | #8 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 32
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
i heard he got a hernia carrying it.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. |
06-20-2006, 05:04 PM | #9 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
I would say the flaw in his method lies in the calculation of YPA. On our team for example I bet Samuels and Dock got screwed because teams stack the line and our YPA goes down big time. Through no real fault of them really. In reality because they pose such a relative threat versus the passing game they get punished. I honestly feel his block percentages are a better indicator.
|
06-20-2006, 05:05 PM | #10 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
|
|
06-20-2006, 05:06 PM | #11 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
i think dockery and thomas are at least equal. therefore, i would take dockery just because of his age. i think he made great strides last season and wouldnt be surprised if he made the pro bowl this season
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
06-20-2006, 05:12 PM | #12 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
|
|
06-20-2006, 05:18 PM | #13 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,297
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
I still think they are overrated and dont play with heart or passion. I will take thomas and jansen over those guys any day of the week and twice on sunday...
|
06-20-2006, 05:26 PM | #14 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
Wow. That's a pretty strong statement. How can you back that up? I think Buges might disagree with you. |
|
06-20-2006, 06:29 PM | #15 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,297
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
Keep in mind that redskins linemen are going to rate higher then Rams linemen because we were in MAX protect Most ever single play. Having a TE on the outside of your tackles every play really helps the OT stats. Our tackles are helped out by TE and RB chipping the DE every play. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|