![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Sorry for the delay here, I was running some errands and dealing with some work emergencies.
With the latter in mind, I first want to say RIP Dan Wheldon. Great driver, better person. Redskins lost a game in the field of competition, he unfortunately lost his life Dan Wheldon dies following IndyCar crash at Vegas - ESPN On to the smack: The 1st Half Defense: Couldn't believe it when Landry said after the game that they basically came out in the first half without any sense of purpose. Couldn't believe it because it showed. I know, I know Rex's interceptions tired them out early. That's total bull. The defense played sloppy the first half, missing tackles, completely whiffing when trying to jam a receiver (c'mon Barnes!), not diving after tipped balls. Seemed like Rocky was just standing there on the Celek tipped catch. And a makeshift OL for the Eagles, and we got almost zero pressure. I'll give them a stud for turning things around, but early on they looked ugly Fred Davis Yeah I know I'm calling giving the smack down to another of today's Studs. We are very fortunate to have FD in our lineup and he has made some great plays all season long. But there were multiple times, not the least of which was the first Rex interception where he made little to no attempt on the ball. He wasn't the only receiver to do so, though. Still, he's got to be more aggressive sometimes. Whoever Decides To Keep Sitting Terrence Austin Let the man play! Rex Grossman I know this is the one you're all waiting for. I still maintain that the first interception was not a bad decision. Three things I thought were likely to happen 1.) FD catches it at the 2 (possibly goes in for a TD) and the crowd goes wild and early on we've got the momentum 2) It falls incomplete and we punt or 3) Ball is intercepted but we pin them deep in their own territory. I didn't expect FD to not make a play and TW to get a penalty. After that, it was pretty much all downhill for Rex. I said at the time, and I'll say again, that throw to Cooley (which at the time I didn't know was about to knock him out for the next month or so) was terrible. He hung his receiver out to dry on a critical 3rd down. He did the same later, I believe with Helu. I like Rex, from a "dealing with the media" perspective, you'd be hard pressed to find a more accommodating guy, but Redskins fans aren't looking for that. The other three interceptions, I'd have to go back and watch them again, but from what I saw it was all on Rex. All on him trying to make a play. And why was he trying to make a play? Because of.... Kyle Shanahan I knew he wasn't going to run just because it was the Eagles, because KS doesn't prepare his game plan based on the opponent's known weaknesses. Never has, never will. And I don't really have a problem with that. I do have a problem with not taking advantage of two solid backs in Torain and Helu. I do have a problem with ignoring one of football's basic tenents "When you're trying to get your new offensive line to gel, run the ball and let them get into their groove" I commend Locklear, Cook, and the rest of that makeshift line for the work they did today. Kyle didn't put them in a good spot. And I do have a problem with him trying to make Rex more than he is. If we were even tied at the half, I'm fully confident we win. But we put on Rex's shoulders, at home where you had to know he was going to get booed mercilessly, and that just isn't the right game plan. Sidenote: You just know that if Rex had that fumble Beck had, it would have gone back for 6. By the way, I thought Beck was fine but I still think he sells the play action horribly Well, I'm sure there's plenty more. But as I said earlier this week, my concern is not losing this game so much as it's hoping this doesn't turn things in a negative direction for us. It's one game. Let's see what these guys are made of. Yes it was a big game, but 3-2 is better than 2-4. I'll have to see to it though that we don't schedule Philly after a bye anymore.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
The biggest issue here is that the Redskins really shouldn't have been gearing up to compete in the NFC East and trying to convince people that they could do so with John Beck and Rex Grossman. 3-2 puts this team ahead of schedule, all things considered. And if the Redskins themselves hadn't allowed expectations to get unreasonable, we'd be talking about this team the same way as the Cincinnati Bengals, as an overachiever.
But while 3-2 is a decent start, it's not a good enough start to overcome the total lack of an offense. The Shanahan's should come out and explicitly say that they are building an offense that they can count on for next year. Play Austin. Play Hankerson. Play Davis. We're wasting time with veterans who are hurting us in the short term and have no long term value. And I just don't understand it. Half of the wins by the Eagles and Cowboys have come against the Redskins. The Cardinals and Rams have combined for one win. The Giants win is still the clear outlier, but this team isn't good. It's a product of it's schedule.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,378
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
In the long run this will make the younger guys better players.
__________________
I need something to cheer about Redskin Fan since '88 Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,378
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,174
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
RUN D was a joke today
Rex Grossman literally killed us today KS- Dude WTF?
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
My smack down is to Rex and Kyle primarily, but to the team in general for letting the Eagles' season off the hook. At 1-5, they're done. Now they're 2-4, they just got a division win heading into a bye, and coming off the bye they play 3 straight at home. Not only did we blow a massive opportunity to improve our season, we breathed life right back into one of our major rivals. Failure.
__________________
Tardy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
For the second time this year.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
That said, we don't need Beck to be great, just competent. If he can at least achieve that, I suspect it will make a world of difference on both sides of the ball. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
This piss-poor playcalling/gameplanning is becoming a trend. If it doesn't improve before mid-season, MS needs to either take the OC reigns and minimize KS's role or get rid of him. This is not difficult to fix, I could fix it tomorrow.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
Kyle drove me mad today.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
JUST LIVIN
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 63
Posts: 4,916
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
I hated this hire from the get go because as long as mikes here sos his son.If kyle wasnt his son I wouldnt have had a problem with the hire,but theres a HUGE conflict of interest
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
Completely agree. Just the perception, that im positive many players and other coaches have, of the sitution is bad for the team.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down
Quote:
Its a pretty easy fix. Mike just needs to take over game planning and play calling. Coach to the team's strengths and attack the opposing teams weaknesses, then get fancy.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|