|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-03-2005, 06:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 46
Posts: 172
|
Burress to Minnesota?
http://newyorkpost.com/sports/giants/41707.htm
Steeler Plaxico Burress, the most intriguing receiver on the market, is likely headed for Minnesota to replace Randy Moss. The Giants yesterday made contact with Michael Harrison, the agent for Burress, who was led to believe the Giants want to address other priorities first. I think this would be good news if it caused them NOT to take a WR in the first round with Oakland's pick (which I think is likely). That would probably leave us any reciever we wanted save Edwards. What do you guys think? |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
03-03-2005, 06:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 46
Posts: 172
|
Re: Burress to Minnesota?
Or possibly any WR we want if the bears take a RB (also possible)
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 06:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 25
|
Re: Burress to Minnesota?
How nice would that be to have Mike Williams running down the sideline and santana running across the middle, Ramsey will have a all pro year
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 06:31 PM
|
#4 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Burress to Minnesota?
now if it's true that would be good.The New York Post, aren't they like the Washington Times? write what they want and hope it becomes true
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 07:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,254
|
Re: Burress to Minnesota?
I really don't know why the Bears would take a RB. Jones did just fine last year behind a shitty ass line.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
