Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
well, if you paid for 100% of preventitive care and nothing for those that failed to get free preventitive care...
like say you got your yearly cancer screening, you're more likely to catch it early and potentially save a million in costs by not waiting till late stage onset. or do some kind of cost share to prevent people from taking $5mill surgery when 50k surgery would be 95% as effective.
it is a bit surprising just based on how loudly people said it'd fail at court, but I guess it's for real now. at least until someone tries another appeal.
|
Repeal vote scheduled for July 9th, per Eric Cantor. Symbolic vote.