Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII
#1- Its easy in hind sight to say the NFLPA knew or should have known, but there always is the possibility they didn't, just like some believe the possibility the NFL didn't collude.
#2- whether they agreed or not seems to be whether they had enough (even if it's circumstantial or not) evidence to file a law suit.
So the NFLPA is faced wih turning down the deal with the NFL... What do they have to bring a law suit? The NFL maybe didn't even tell them which teams were going to be punished just that two teams needed punished. So who do they contact about collusion if they don't even know who was being punished? Again they had no evidence.
The NFLPA agrees to the punishments, learns who failed to follow the agreement, has proof of it because Mara and Goodell opened their idiot mouths, and the fact two teams were punished for not following an agreement. There's your proof.
Otherwise they had nothing but behind the scenes communication not recorded that no one nor judge would believe.
|
So, basically you think DeMaurice Smith is playing chess while Goodell is playing checkers?
Is that what you're talking yourself into?
Next question, how exactly do you think the salary cap reallocation letter would read without naming which teams' caps were modified?