Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
1 disagreement and 1 question -
I disagree about your blogger statement. The nflpa doesn't rely on bloggers for proof, but the comments that goodell and mara made that served as the basis for the blogs. Many proofs have been given that the accepting of reallocation isn't proof, but explicit statements by the commissioner and the chairman of the nflmc may be.
The question:
Why put on Kabuki theater when there is no need? DSmith has already been elected and noone was going to kick him out anytime soon.
I don't think their statements are ridiculous, but they will have to get past that waiver before any merits are ever looked at.
|
What they're trying to avoid is this line of discussion:
"If you say the League had a secret salary cap, and you believe that the League punishing 4 teams for violating that secret cap is wrong, why did you approve the punishment and actually actively help the League punish those teams?"
"Uh, we didn't ask why the League was punishing the teams - we thought it was for something else."
"Really?"
"OK, actually they were going to give us something we wanted if we helped them punish the teams - plus I wanted to be re-elected."
"So...you agreed in 2011 to waive any claims based on potential collusion 2010 as part of the new CBA, and you agreed in 2012 to help the League punish the teams for not participating in this supposed collusion, but now you're suing the League for collusion in 2010?"
"Yeah, well all that happened before March 12, 2012. We didn't know anything about what the League had been up to before we saw the league's press release and read profootballtalk.com on March 12."
Step back for a minute, and ask yourself if that's remotely believable.