Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopheadVII
I thought the Jenkins article was a good one. This is Kabuki theater designed to make DeMaurice Smith look like he's standing up for the players against the owners.
To be clear, the NFLPA has: - signed a written statement agreeing to waive all claims re: contract practices in 2010
- Signed off on the NFL punishing four teams to get D. Smith re-elected
- Claimed that punishing four teams wasn't evidence of collusion but that blogger opinion of that punishment is (because if the actual punishment were proof, they obviously approved it)
- Claimed there was a secret $123m cap, despite that googling "nfl team salary 2010" will show that 16 of 32 teams were over that number.
- Claims that the league is selectively punishing the #1,2,3 & 8 spenders in 2010 but not #4,5,6,&7
They're going back on their agreement, and they're making up ridiculous arguments to get "NFLPA Sues NFL for $1 Billon" as a headline. |
1 disagreement and 1 question -
I disagree about your blogger statement. The nflpa doesn't rely on bloggers for proof, but the comments that goodell and mara made that served as the basis for the blogs. Many proofs have been given that the accepting of reallocation isn't proof, but explicit statements by the commissioner and the chairman of the nflmc may be.
The question:
Why put on Kabuki theater when there is no need? DSmith has already been elected and noone was going to kick him out anytime soon.
I don't think their statements are ridiculous, but they will have to get past that waiver before any merits are ever looked at.