Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut
More false assumptions.
Do you even know my point?
Because it sure seems like you're so intent on having an argument that my actuall points seem lost on you.
|
Your initial point is not lost to me. In fact, I find this discourse rather fruitful and pleasant, at least for me; I intend no sarcasm and harbor no ill feelings. I'll provide a brief summary of your point, just to answer your question and show your own assumptions about my intents and my mental state are false.
Your main point: Our O-line is in a worse state than our WRs.
In particular, our RT situation is horrible.
Right tackle is a more important matter for us than wide receiver. We should used our resources to acquire a player that would have improved that position.
You attempted to justify your main point by addressing the following matters:
Why our WRs are in a relatively good state.
Why our OL is in a relatively bad state.
Why addressing WR the way we did was not good
Why not addressing the OL(RT), so far, was not good.
The rest of your post is not forgotten either, and I'll respond later, but sleep beckons.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".
Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.
The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is
Don Juan.