Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
No, you have it wrong. It's dishonest and unproductive to make the comparison between Tannehill and Luck/Griffin. Physically, it's not close. Tannehill is a good athlete for a quarterback. He can make plays with his legs, and can outrun some linebackers.
But Luck and Griffin are two of the better athletes at the position that have come out in years. |
Just last year you have Newton, Locker, Kaepernick, Tyrod Taylor and Josh Portis all great athletes and you kinda have to throw Terrelle Pryor in there too.
Mayock and other people like to pull out Luck's one handed catch on a wide open QB throwback pass as evidence of his athleticism.
It seems silly to profess that the guy that
lead his team in receiving for 2 years (2008 and 2009) isn't at least equally as athletic.
If you wanna say that Griffin is in another class then sure I can understand that, he's a near Olympic caliber athlete.
But its beyond me how anyone can deny that Tannehill, who was the both the best WR and the best QB on the Aggies, doesn't at least have an equal level (if not is flat out superior) of athleticism then Luck.
To me, and I could be way off base, but your opinions of Tannehill kinda smacks of someone that really hasn't watched very much of Tannehill at all really.
Quote:
|
However, I don't think the limitations Tannehill has shown within pocket shouldn't just be shrugged off.
|
Don't worry about shrugging them off because you're probably the only one that thinks he has them, especially in comparison to Foles and Cousins.
Quote:
|
I think Tannehill throws the ball to some area of the field really well, and not as well to others.
|
This is a generic criticism that could be levied against any QB prospect.
The irony is that I'm not even a Tannehill 'guy' , at first I begrudgingly watched him after he took the top spot from Jerrod Johnson.