|
Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanix544
We need a qb. instead of it being
"Best Player Available", for us, it looks like this.
"Best QB Available". Then an OL and a WR.
Not too worried about defense, and definitely not worried about TE or RB, Shanny has at least shown that he knows a thing or two about late round gems, or at least coaching them up the right way for them to be productive.
I wouldnt be mad if we draft a QB, then go WR in Second, and then OL in third and both of our 4ths.
If we think RG3 Or Tannehill could tumble a bit, trade down in the first round and see about adding a pick in the 2nd or 3rd. This would be the draft to trade down and still get a blue chipper QB. Alot of good - great talent, and not too many teams needing a QB. Other than Denver, miami, colts maybe and TB and Seattle, I think most teams are set. But it would be a gamble.
|
You approach of "Best QB available" would be disastrous if this QB class wasn't as good as its hyped up to be. I'm glad it is not 2003, in which Palmer was the only good first round QB in that draft.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".
Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.
The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
|