Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Mechanix544 · 11-18-2011, 04:48 PM

We need a qb. instead of it being

"Best Player Available", for us, it looks like this.

"Best QB Available". Then an OL and a WR.

Not too worried about defense, and definitely not worried about TE or RB, Shanny has at least shown that he knows a thing or two about late round gems, or at least coaching them up the right way for them to be productive.

I wouldnt be mad if we draft a QB, then go WR in Second, and then OL in third and both of our 4ths.

If we think RG3 Or Tannehill could tumble a bit, trade down in the first round and see about adding a pick in the 2nd or 3rd. This would be the draft to trade down and still get a blue chipper QB. Alot of good - great talent, and not too many teams needing a QB. Other than Denver, miami, colts maybe and TB and Seattle, I think most teams are set. But it would be a gamble.

11-18-2011, 04:48 PM	#255
Mechanix544 The Starter Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Fort Bliss, TX Posts: 2,277	Re: Build the Redskins for 2012 We need a qb. instead of it being "Best Player Available", for us, it looks like this. "Best QB Available". Then an OL and a WR. Not too worried about defense, and definitely not worried about TE or RB, Shanny has at least shown that he knows a thing or two about late round gems, or at least coaching them up the right way for them to be productive. I wouldnt be mad if we draft a QB, then go WR in Second, and then OL in third and both of our 4ths. If we think RG3 Or Tannehill could tumble a bit, trade down in the first round and see about adding a pick in the 2nd or 3rd. This would be the draft to trade down and still get a blue chipper QB. Alot of good - great talent, and not too many teams needing a QB. Other than Denver, miami, colts maybe and TB and Seattle, I think most teams are set. But it would be a gamble. Last edited by Mechanix544; 11-18-2011 at 04:53 PM.