Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok
He has some drops but He's 6"4 and has long arms. He's a possession guy Imo
Big red zone target which we haven't had in how long?
|
...You know, Santonio Holmes is 5'10", and he's still a big red zone target. They throw him a lot of back shoulder fades on DB's who are a hair taller than him.
I keep hearing about this mystical "big red zone target", but I just don't see them in fashion as much as Redskins fans like to say. Maybe it's because they feel like we haven't had one, but red zone production isn't just about having a big wide receiver who is a "big target".
In the red zone, it's more about quarterbacks making quicker decisions in a smaller space and making better decisions at that. Having a tall guy in the red zone is a plus, but it's not necessary, especially if the defense knows you're probably going to be throwing the ball to the tall guy because he's tall.
Tall=/=good receiver, nor does it equal a good red zone target.
Fans kept screaming "TALL, TALL, TALL!" at Vinny Cerrato, so he drafted two of the tallest receivers available, then got a tall-ish tight end. So far, only Fred Davis has proven to be a viable target down in the red zone on a someone consistent basis (all three of his touchdowns were down on the goal line).
Besides, didn't we just draft two (actually talented, actually productive) tall wide receivers?
I think we need to kick the height fetish and just get players at the wide receiver position that can catch the football period.