[30gut]

Originally Posted by skinster

Actually the browns get more yards per game than the rams. But they are close enough that it is irrelivant.

Right.
But you said this:

Also, McCoy greatly benefits from Hillis

Which is why i pointed out that in fact Stephen Jackson gives Bradford more YPG then Hillis gives the Browns:

Originally Posted by 30gut

Stephen Jackson actually gives Bradford more yards per game then Hillis does for the Browns: 83.2 ypg vs 82.3 ypg
NFL Stats: by Player Category

What I find to be most relivant for a featured back is YPC and TDs. The fact that Jackson has significantly worse ypc, but the same yards means that the rams (bradford) completes more 3rd down conversions than the browns.

This is a unsupported blanket assumption/opinion/speculation the lower ypc could have any number of meanings.

Anyways, I view McCoy as a lesser roethlesberger. Someone who is not a conventional qb, but finds a way to win. His numbers do suck though, and he has not done enough to convince me beyond doubt that he has what it takes to lead a winning ballclub. I haven't written McCoy off yet, but he still hasn't done enough to prove anything to me.

Colts numbers sucks? But Bradford's are the best you've ever seen for a rookie QB?
81/127---63.8 comp %
975 yards
7.7 YPA
3 TDs/ 3 INTs
85.3 QB Rating

I view McCoy kinda like a cross between a more disciplined version of Romo and a bigger stronger armed Jeff Garcia.
Anyway here's some McCoy highlights: