Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
Bush's inarticulateness and intellectual deficiencies is undisputed but at least he has core principles he adheres to regardless of whether you agree with them or not. He doesn't profess to be noble but rather that he is right in his noble actions. Ron Paul on the other hand professes to be noble in both ideas and actions yet his actions never reflect his noble ideas. A man that does not live by the tenets of his core principles is far more wretched than a man whose core principles you disagree with. That is to say it is far more sinister to place an earmark into a bill, vote against the bill and then decry earmarks the next day than to embark on war you believe to be just under false pretense.
|
What Ron Paul professes doesn't start or end with him. He didn't invent Austrian economics and many of the things that he advocates are already in law. Rob Paul is a reactionary not a radical.
Tim Russert will be missed. That leftist lap dog they have up there now just throws softballs to Democrats and uses sound-bite arguements against the Republicans. Russert actually made them all sweat. Without him I don't watch FTN. Clinton's old lap dog has a better show IMO.