View Single Post
Old 12-28-2004, 08:36 PM   #33
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
How about the way he lost control and the respect of the players in the locker room?
This is the main difference between Spurrier and Gibbs and this point. Each time I read Dasels rants on Gibbs, I really dont know how to respond to the play calling aquisitions, becasue like him, I wasent around for the first run, so I understand the hesitation to trust Gibbs. However, I think its obvious that Gibbs has a grasp on the players, a trust from the players and a general feeling that things are going to be turned around. Whereas I dont think Steve Spurrier had that, and thats why he stepped down.

I really dont know how to defend the playcalling as a whole , because I too think it has been fairly poor. Although I do agree with running the ball at the end of the game last week. However, I think a big thing to build on is that Gibbs is a leader for the team, which is somthing the head coach should be. I wouldnt mind if we had a new offensive mind added to the staff to try to give it a more modern feel, but I know Gibbs should stay here, and I'm glad hes going to be, and I think the players are as well.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.12354 seconds with 10 queries