[SC Skins Fan]

Not to offer up a defense of JLC or anything, but that dude (who actually does work for a legitimate news outlet and presumably does actually have at least a few legitimate sources) cites a "source" and the guy is a pariah and a hack and we get LM's wonderful "source meter." But bleacherreport.com "the place for fan-journalists to create and critique high-quality sports analysis" cites an "inside source" and throws out a completely absurd trade and it receives half-a-second of credence? And I know almost everyone here called BS, but wow. The internet has apparently corrupted our collective societal ability to critique source material. Every man his own reporter, whether he have the training or ability (or basic literacy) to perform the task.