Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud
You're a confused dude BigHair. On Wednesday I suggested we take the best OL or LB available at 13, and I listed some names, one of which was Duke Robinson, the guard from Oklahoma.
Your response to my suggestion:
I dont get all the love for duke robinson... he's a guard. You dont take a guard in the 1st round... its just foolish. besides, we've already got Rinehart, Thomas, and Kendall could resign here. Have Rinehart start with either Thomas or Kendall, alongside Samuels, a new center and a new RT, and our offensive line will be fine next year. We can then replace Thomas/Kendall in 2010.
Link: http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-l...tml#post518617
Then today you start a thread suggesting how badly we need guards and that we should take Duke Robinson in the 1st round. To quote you, that's "foolish," no?? Care to explain?
I suppose in the last 48 hours you had some revelation about how drafting a guard in the first round goes from foolish to a necessity. 
|
It said it on a Mock Draft website so it must be true. Those sites are gold!
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
|