Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

FRPLG · 10-06-2008, 04:06 PM

I am still confused about what the point of getting worked up about this is. He didn't rank us 15th. He gave us what I think is a generally fair ranking. I may quibble some with the rankings but in general they are decent. And if they weren't? Why care? What matters is that we win games. The number of games won is the number that matters. What some know nothing sports columnist says is entirely irrelevant.

Why are we constantly looking for this contrived (that word again) validation?

10-06-2008, 04:06 PM	#21
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 10,164	Re: King's "MM QB" I am still confused about what the point of getting worked up about this is. He didn't rank us 15th. He gave us what I think is a generally fair ranking. I may quibble some with the rankings but in general they are decent. And if they weren't? Why care? What matters is that we win games. The number of games won is the number that matters. What some know nothing sports columnist says is entirely irrelevant. Why are we constantly looking for this contrived (that word again) validation?