Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SUNRA
Anybody that votes for Ramsey wants the sack and interception stats to increase with great velocity. Take all polls you want Ramsey's not playing until Brunell is carried off of the field. Now you're definitely are not a Redskins fan if you wish this on Brunell.
|
once again, ramsey has a higer TD/game and lower TD/turnover ratio, has a higher yard per play average AND gives up about 28 less points... and i honestly doubt he'd get sacked much more, the oline has been much much much better than last year. so that arguement is dead, and brunell still sucks.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SUNRA
I have defended Brunell too. What I noticed about Brunell's passes that seemed to be thrown out of bounds, 1) Coles was pushed out of bounds and tried to come back in to catch it,so that's a no winner. 2) Was the play when Coles was wide open and it looked like the ball was deflected. Brunell missed bad on that one if that wasn't a deflection. The O line is still struggling. Lastly, you will agree that the play calling is too conservative but understandably so. No Oline, no strong QB = the running game, but let's see some screens or slant passet across the middle. Wait a minute I don't know about that one. Let's keep Portis in the groove.
|
the Oline was above average today, and the running game was there, you can't blame brunell's sucking on either of those factors this week, he sucked hard and all on his own... even i could see wide open receivers often... the play calling asked for deep passes, which were only about 4 miles off target... the play calling was conservative cause the QB couldn't hit anything over 10 yards... it was conservative because IT HAD TO BE, brunell was too crappy to open anything up.
2 games in a row, less than 100 yards passing, averaging 7 points given up per game, under 40% completion rate, about 4 yards per play... he's done, bench him... goodbye.