[BleedBurgundy]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

You are a "glass is half full kinda guy" right? The Cardinals, and average team as you say....well they dominated the time of possession against the Skins, had over TWICE the number of total yards than the Skins.

The Cardinals ran 73 plays to only 47 for the Redskins and dominated every statistical category -- except turnovers. The Redskins had three takeaways, which proved to be just enough to negate Arizona's advantage everywhere else.

And even though we hate to admit it, the Redskins were 18" away from losing yet another game in which they had the lead at halftime. Redskins dodges a bullet on thier home field. It was 21-6 at the start of the 4th quarter, and Washington almost lost it with that Rakers field goal. 18" to the right and the outcome would have been different. The difference in this game was the turnovers

But the Dallas game was different, Dallas outgained the Vikings 381-196 and Vikings QB Tavaris Jackson was just 6-of-19 for 72 yards. The Cowboys have given up just three rushing touchdowns all season and have not allowed a single 100-yard rusher. Vikings rookie Adrian Peterson, who rushed for 224 yards last week, was limited to 63 yards rushing.
Additionally, Dallas is the first team this season to score a rushing TD against the Vikings defense. The score does not accurately show how lopsided it could have been. Dallas dominated the TOP, yards from scrimmage, and every aspect of the game except turnovers. Again that score could have easily been 34 - 14, except for turnovers and Dallas running the clock out in the second half.

I said you did barely enough to beat an average team with a horrible quarterback. Not should've would've could've won by more. You DID (hence fact, reality, non-fiction, etc.) barely enough to win. Congrats. That glass is sooo half full.