Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmanc711
Well guess what guys...if the players had the chance to execute whatever, than they would pay someone like me ten bucks a hour to go out there and coach the skins, not pay someone five million dollars a year....
You can play the "coaches can do no wrong" card all you want, but there is a reason they are getting paid out the ass and thats becuase some coaches can be the difference between winning and losing football games....if it was as simple as guys executing plays, than no coaches would ever get fired and whoever was on the feild would be the only ones whos jobs are on the line....I just hate the fact that we cant question this horseshit somtimes.
|
Uh, no? I can't really counter-argument your post because there obviously is no correlation between the way Dan Snyder perceives the NFL, and the way games are actually won and lost. This much is obvious so far.
So to say that he thinks he is making his team a lot better by paying Al Saunders a lot of money is probably accurate, but if we had you calling the plays instead I think you'd do just fine. I believe you'd agree with me since you are so critical of the playcalling.
But yeah, I wouldn't make an argument relying on Dan Snyder's understanding of the game of football...