Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Gibbs called the final 4 plays...(No he didn't)

memphisskin · 09-23-2007, 10:33 PM

Makes a lot of sense. In Gibbs 2.0, he's been almost obsessed with turnovers, to the point that our offense has been almost effectively neutered. I love Gibbs to death, but running Portis solely up the middle makes as much sense as offroading in a Ferrari. And they've been saying how much improvement Campbell has made, let's see them back that up and let the guy throw. I don't disagree with running the ball on first down in the 2nd half, we had a lead and you have to shorten the game at that point.

Oh, and I've heard Gibbs say this before, that Betts and Portis are interchangeable. Then why does one guy get paid so much more than the other guy? Maybe because he's better, perhaps? So why not go with the guy who cashes the big checks, there's probably a very good reason why he makes so much money.

09-23-2007, 10:33 PM	#3
memphisskin Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Nashville, TN Age: 53 Posts: 960	Re: Gibbs called the final 4 plays.. Makes a lot of sense. In Gibbs 2.0, he's been almost obsessed with turnovers, to the point that our offense has been almost effectively neutered. I love Gibbs to death, but running Portis solely up the middle makes as much sense as offroading in a Ferrari. And they've been saying how much improvement Campbell has made, let's see them back that up and let the guy throw. I don't disagree with running the ball on first down in the 2nd half, we had a lead and you have to shorten the game at that point. Oh, and I've heard Gibbs say this before, that Betts and Portis are interchangeable. Then why does one guy get paid so much more than the other guy? Maybe because he's better, perhaps? So why not go with the guy who cashes the big checks, there's probably a very good reason why he makes so much money.