Quote:
Originally Posted by dallass-blows 2
i said zero because he has not been found guilty. this reminds me of the duke lax case.
|
This is nothing like the Duke case.
In the Duke case, they were being accused of something without any legitimate evidence and the prosecutor was trying to pump up his legal resume so he can win an election.
In this case, there is solid evidence that this DID happen on his property and many witnesses that say he was directly involved in it. Plus, this case involves killing living creatures. I've heard that if you see the property, there is NO doubt what went on there.