Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Monksdown · 07-17-2007, 04:53 PM

I agree with 19, give or take 5. We have ONE sure thing, top of the line linebacker(Marcus). Now lets look at the facts behind him. London is aging, but will probably make the players around him better. And Rocky is supposed to be the real deal. Depends on how much hype you allow yourself to swallow.

Those are the reasons that Im not bothered by the rank. They've got the pieces, lets see what GW does w/ them.

07-17-2007, 04:53 PM	#5
Monksdown The Starter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Warrenton, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 1,515	Re: Scouts Inc. LB rankings I agree with 19, give or take 5. We have ONE sure thing, top of the line linebacker(Marcus). Now lets look at the facts behind him. London is aging, but will probably make the players around him better. And Rocky is supposed to be the real deal. Depends on how much hype you allow yourself to swallow. Those are the reasons that Im not bothered by the rank. They've got the pieces, lets see what GW does w/ them.