Re: What is your major contention with the proposed Briggs deal?
1)The magnitude of the contract Briggs is getting negates a lot of the future cap space we freed up with the Archuleta and Patten cuts.
2)Were probably going to have to cut Wynn to make this jive with the cap
3)This move doesn't improve the defense all that much. Defensive Line is still more important, and this still compromises our ability to improve there.
Out of the poll choices, I'd take both "out of position to get an impact player at No. 6" and "doesn't fill a need" if I could.
At the very least, this trade pours more resources into the defensive side of the ball where we badly need them. That's always a plus.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
|