|
Re: So Will We Have The Money For Betts????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10
The franchise tag would require us to devote the average salary of the five most highly paid backs in the NFL to our salary cap. If a team signed Betts, we'd be entitled to two first round picks (or otherwise negotiated compensation). We would never franchise Betts because no team is going to deem him worthy of a deal commanded by the top 5 RBs in the league.
The transition tag means we have to tender the average salary of the top 10 backs in the league. We get the right to match any contract, but if we let him go, we get no compensation.
I originally posed the idea, but after thinking about it, tagging him is not a realistic option. Probably going to have to let him walk.
|
Until the owners work out the whole use of poison pills issue, using the transition tag at all is just asking for trouble.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
|